Study Comparing Two Different Methods of Treating Periodontal Disease
Outcomes of Traditional and Medical Models of Periodontal Therapy
3 other identifiers
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purposes of this study are to:
- 1.compare the clinical effectiveness of a traditional and a medical model of periodontal therapy; and
- 2.determine the value of the two approaches to periodontal therapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2000
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2000
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 5, 2005
CompletedDecember 2, 2010
November 1, 2010
August 4, 2005
November 30, 2010
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Clinical attachment loss
Quality of life
Tooth loss
Plaque accumulation
Suppuration
Bleeding on probing
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>/= 4 or more periodontally involved teeth as defined by pocket depth of \>/= 6mm.
- \>/= 14 teeth.
- \> 18 years of age.
- Reside in the greater Boston area.
You may not qualify if:
- Those patients requiring prophylactic antibiotic for dental treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Forsyth Institutelead
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)collaborator
- Delta Dental Plan Massachusettscollaborator
- Harvard Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The Forsyth Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Richard Niederman
The Forsyth Institute
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2005
First Posted
August 5, 2005
Study Start
June 1, 2000
Study Completion
October 1, 2004
Last Updated
December 2, 2010
Record last verified: 2010-11