Study Stopped
Unable to enroll enough patients
Near Infrared Light for the Treatment of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy
A Phase III, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy of Adjunct Monochromatic Near-infrared Photoenergy (MIRE) in Patients With Painful Axonal Peripheral Neuropathy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if near infrared light therapy is effective in decreasing pain in patients with painful peripheral neuropathy. The hypothesis of the study was that the percentage of subjects with at least 40% improvement in visual analog scale score for pain after 4 weeks of treatment is higher for Monochromatic Near-infrared Photoenergy (MIRE) treatment than for sham treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jul 2005
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 29, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2012
CompletedSeptember 5, 2012
August 1, 2012
4.8 years
July 27, 2005
August 2, 2012
August 2, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Subjects That Have a Greater Than or Equal to Forty Percent Decrease on the Visual Analog Pain Scale at the End of Four Weeks of Treatment
Pain was measured by a 10 cm long Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS does not have any pre-set marks between the extremes. On this scale 0 means no pain and 10 cm means extreme pain. The investigator measures the mark made by the subject in cm and records this for the value of pain.
baseline, 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Percentage of Subjects That Have a Forty Percent Reduction of Pain Measured by the Neuropathic Pain Scale at the End of Four Weeks of Treatment
baseline, 4 weeks
Percentage of Subjects That Have an Improvement of Two Points or More on the SF-8 at the End of Four Weeks of Treatment
baseline, 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
MIRE
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects randomized to this arm will receive treatment with monochromatic near infrared photo energy (MIRE).
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORSubjects randomized to this arm will receive treatment with the sham device, which is non-active but otherwise identical to the study device.
Interventions
Monochromatic near infrared photo energy (MIRE). A 30-minute application of MIRE results in a radiant exposure of 43.2 joules per square centimeter (J/cm\^2). The design of the flexible pads allows the infrared energy to be delivered perpendicular to and in contact with the involved site. MIRE applied to the skin facilitates the release of a small molecule of the free radical nitric oxide from hemoglobin and other proteins in surrounding tissue. Increased levels of nitric oxide improve the circulation of blood enhancing wound healing and reducing pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults ages 18-85; able to give informed consent
- Documented painful, distal peripheral neuropathy of idiopathic cause, or related to impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes mellitus.
- Neuropathy documented by one of the following studies: nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography (EMG); quantitative sensory testing of the foot with Computer Aided Sensory Evaluator (CASE IV); quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (Quantitative Sweat MeasurementSystem \[Q-Sweat\]); neurology specialty examination; and neuropathy impairment score (NIS) of less than 25.
- Stable pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain for at least two weeks.
- Optimal pharmacotherapy has been achieved.
- Subjects cannot be on Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX 2) inhibitors
- Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of greater than or equal to 4/10
- Subject has provided written informed consent
- Not currently using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)
- Not currently receiving acupuncture
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or likely to become pregnant
- Current diagnosis of cancer
- Neuropathy impairment score (NIS) of greater than 25.
- Diagnosis of severe neuropathy of known etiology for which specific treatment is available (i.e., acute and chronic inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathies, vasculitis, B 12 deficiency).
- Unstable diabetes mellitus defined as a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) greater than 9%, and/or 10% of fasting blood sugars greater than 300 mg/dl for the week prior to enrollment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mayo Cliniclead
- Anodyne Therapy, LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mayo Clinic Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85254, United States
Related Publications (10)
Galer BS, Jensen MP. Development and preliminary validation of a pain measure specific to neuropathic pain: the Neuropathic Pain Scale. Neurology. 1997 Feb;48(2):332-8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.2.332.
PMID: 9040716BACKGROUNDBackonja M, Beydoun A, Edwards KR, Schwartz SL, Fonseca V, Hes M, LaMoreaux L, Garofalo E. Gabapentin for the symptomatic treatment of painful neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1998 Dec 2;280(21):1831-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.21.1831.
PMID: 9846777BACKGROUNDDyck PJ, Kratz KM, Lehman KA, Karnes JL, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Brien PC, Litchy WJ, Windebank AJ, Smith BE, Low PA, et al. The Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study: design, criteria for types of neuropathy, selection bias, and reproducibility of neuropathic tests. Neurology. 1991 Jun;41(6):799-807. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.6.799.
PMID: 2046920BACKGROUNDHolland NR. Idiopathic painful sensory neuropathy. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2001 Jun;2(4):211-20. doi: 10.1097/00131402-200106000-00008.
PMID: 19078638BACKGROUNDKochman AB, Carnegie DH, Burke TJ. Symptomatic reversal of peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002 Mar;92(3):125-30. doi: 10.7547/87507315-92-3-125.
PMID: 11904323BACKGROUNDLeonard DR, Farooqi MH, Myers S. Restoration of sensation, reduced pain, and improved balance in subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with monochromatic near-infrared treatment. Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):168-72. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.1.168.
PMID: 14693984BACKGROUNDMendell JR, Sahenk Z. Clinical practice. Painful sensory neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 27;348(13):1243-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp022282. No abstract available.
PMID: 12660389BACKGROUNDPrendergast JJ, Miranda G, Sanchez M. Improvement of sensory impairment in patients with peripheral neuropathy. Endocr Pract. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):24-30. doi: 10.4158/EP.10.1.24.
PMID: 15251618BACKGROUNDKoltzenburg M. Painful neuropathies. Curr Opin Neurol. 1998 Oct;11(5):515-21. doi: 10.1097/00019052-199810000-00014.
PMID: 9848001BACKGROUNDWolfe GI, Trivedi JR. Painful peripheral neuropathy and its nonsurgical treatment. Muscle Nerve. 2004 Jul;30(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/mus.20057.
PMID: 15221874BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study was terminated early because the study was unable to enroll enough patients.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Matthew A. Butters
- Organization
- Mayo Clinic
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew A Butters, MD
Mayo Clinic
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2005
First Posted
July 29, 2005
Study Start
July 1, 2005
Primary Completion
April 1, 2010
Study Completion
April 1, 2010
Last Updated
September 5, 2012
Results First Posted
September 5, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-08