NCT00123656

Brief Summary

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently recognized entity. It has been thought to be related to both allergies and acid reflux. There have been reports that both swallowed, aerosolized steroids and proton pump inhibitors have been effective treatments. The researchers propose to directly compare the efficacy of aerosolized fluticasone to esomeprazole in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The hypothesis is that aerosolized fluticasone (Flovent) will be more effective in relieving symptoms of EE than esomeprazole (Nexium) treatment. Patients will undergo endoscopy, pH monitoring and manometry for diagnosis. Following diagnosis of EE by pathology (biopsy of esophagus), patients will be randomized to esomeprazole or swallowed fluticasone for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, subjects will be asked to repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies. Three questionnaires (dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\], and allergy) will be completed by the patient at the first endoscopy and at the end endoscopy. The primary objective is to measure change in eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus in response to treatment of allergy (swallowed fluticasone) versus treatment for reflux (esomeprazole) in EE patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2004

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2004

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 21, 2005

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 25, 2005

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2006

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2006

Completed
Last Updated

January 16, 2008

Status Verified

January 1, 2008

Enrollment Period

2.3 years

First QC Date

July 21, 2005

Last Update Submit

January 10, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

Eosinophilic esophagitisesomeprazolefluticasone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To measure change in eosinophil infiltration and degranulation at 8 weeks in response to treatment of allergy versus treatment for GER in EE patients

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To assess change in dysphagia score, GERD symptoms, allergy/atopy at 8 weeks using validated questionnaires

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

fluticasone

Drug: fluticasone

2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

esomeprazole

Drug: esomeprazole

Interventions

esomeprazole dosed qam for 8 weeks

Also known as: Nexium
2

fluticasone dosed 220 mcg 2 puffs swallowed BID for 8 weeks

Also known as: Flovent
1

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18-80 with EE, defined as: a) dysphagia, food impaction or other upper gastrointestinal symptoms (chest pain, heartburn, regurgitation); b) multiple esophageal rings or furrows; c) the presence of \>20 eosinophils/high power field in the squamous epithelium or deeper tissues of the esophagus
  • Ability to undergo esophageal manometry and ambulatory pH monitoring
  • No history of bleeding diathesis, significant cardiopulmonary disease, or other contraindication to upper endoscopy
  • Those who have had a one month holiday from either esomeprazole therapy or fluticasone if they have been prescribed this prior to enrollment

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication to proton pump inhibitors or swallowed fluticasone
  • Need for immediate esophageal dilation at enrollment due to food impaction at the discretion of the performing endoscopist
  • Inability to pass endoscope
  • Pregnancy
  • Incarceration
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • History of esophago-gastric surgery or prior history of abdominal surgery with subsequent strictures or symptoms of obstruction such as abdominal pain and bloating
  • Presence of other esophageal pathology that could account for patients' symptoms as determined by histological interpretation by the pathologist
  • History of esophageal spasm resulting in trouble swallowing foods larger than 1 cm in diameter

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Utah HSC

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

EsophagitisEosinophilic Esophagitis

Interventions

EsomeprazoleFluticasone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Esophageal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesGastroenteritisEosinophiliaLeukocyte DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Omeprazole2-PyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazolesSulfoxidesSulfur CompoundsOrganic ChemicalsPyridinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsBenzimidazolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingAndrostadienesAndrostenesAndrostanesSteroidsFused-Ring CompoundsPolycyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • John C. Fang, M.D.

    University of Utah HSC

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 21, 2005

First Posted

July 25, 2005

Study Start

August 1, 2004

Primary Completion

December 1, 2006

Study Completion

December 1, 2006

Last Updated

January 16, 2008

Record last verified: 2008-01

Locations