Comparison of Esomeprazole to Aerosolized, Swallowed Fluticasone for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) is a recently recognized entity. It has been thought to be related to both allergies and acid reflux. There have been reports that both swallowed, aerosolized steroids and proton pump inhibitors have been effective treatments. The researchers propose to directly compare the efficacy of aerosolized fluticasone to esomeprazole in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. The hypothesis is that aerosolized fluticasone (Flovent) will be more effective in relieving symptoms of EE than esomeprazole (Nexium) treatment. Patients will undergo endoscopy, pH monitoring and manometry for diagnosis. Following diagnosis of EE by pathology (biopsy of esophagus), patients will be randomized to esomeprazole or swallowed fluticasone for 8 weeks. At the end of 8 weeks, subjects will be asked to repeat upper endoscopy with biopsies. Three questionnaires (dysphagia, gastroesophageal reflux disease \[GERD\], and allergy) will be completed by the patient at the first endoscopy and at the end endoscopy. The primary objective is to measure change in eosinophil infiltration of the esophagus in response to treatment of allergy (swallowed fluticasone) versus treatment for reflux (esomeprazole) in EE patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Aug 2004
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2006
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2006
CompletedJanuary 16, 2008
January 1, 2008
2.3 years
July 21, 2005
January 10, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To measure change in eosinophil infiltration and degranulation at 8 weeks in response to treatment of allergy versus treatment for GER in EE patients
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
To assess change in dysphagia score, GERD symptoms, allergy/atopy at 8 weeks using validated questionnaires
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORfluticasone
2
ACTIVE COMPARATOResomeprazole
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-80 with EE, defined as: a) dysphagia, food impaction or other upper gastrointestinal symptoms (chest pain, heartburn, regurgitation); b) multiple esophageal rings or furrows; c) the presence of \>20 eosinophils/high power field in the squamous epithelium or deeper tissues of the esophagus
- Ability to undergo esophageal manometry and ambulatory pH monitoring
- No history of bleeding diathesis, significant cardiopulmonary disease, or other contraindication to upper endoscopy
- Those who have had a one month holiday from either esomeprazole therapy or fluticasone if they have been prescribed this prior to enrollment
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindication to proton pump inhibitors or swallowed fluticasone
- Need for immediate esophageal dilation at enrollment due to food impaction at the discretion of the performing endoscopist
- Inability to pass endoscope
- Pregnancy
- Incarceration
- Inability to provide informed consent
- History of esophago-gastric surgery or prior history of abdominal surgery with subsequent strictures or symptoms of obstruction such as abdominal pain and bloating
- Presence of other esophageal pathology that could account for patients' symptoms as determined by histological interpretation by the pathologist
- History of esophageal spasm resulting in trouble swallowing foods larger than 1 cm in diameter
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah HSC
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John C. Fang, M.D.
University of Utah HSC
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2005
First Posted
July 25, 2005
Study Start
August 1, 2004
Primary Completion
December 1, 2006
Study Completion
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
January 16, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-01