Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Tree Pollen Allergoid With Monophosphoryl Lipid A (MPL) in Patients Sensitized to Tree Pollen
A DoubleBlind Phase 2b Study to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Different Doses of Tyrosine Adsorbed Birch+Hazel+Alder Pollen Allergoid With MPL® in Patients Sensitized to Birch, Hazel, Alder Pollen
2 other identifiers
interventional
68
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT), the administration of gradually increasing quantities of an allergen extract to an allergic patient, is a curative approach which directly treats the underlying allergic disease. Tree MATA MPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with an allergy to tree pollen (hay fever). The purpose of this double-blind Phase IIb study is to assess the tolerability and immunogenicity of different doses of Tree MATA MPL in volunteers allergic to birch, hazel and alder pollen.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jul 2005
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2005
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 7, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 12, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2005
CompletedFebruary 9, 2021
February 1, 2021
2 months
July 1, 2005
February 5, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Immunological response to the three Tree MATA MPL treatment arms compared to placebo (birch specific)
Efficacy was assessed based on the immunological differences between the three Tree MATA MPL treatment arms compared to placebo with respect to immunoglobulins (specific IgG, specific IgG1, specific IgG4, and specific IgE) for birch, alder, and hazel.
Up to two approximately 2 months
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Tolerability of individual subcutaneous doses
Up to two approximately 2 months
Tolerability of the cumulative subcutaneous doses
Up to two approximately 2 months
safety laboratory evaluation - clinical chemistry
Up to two approximately 2 months
safety laboratory evaluation - hematology
Up to two approximately 2 months
safety laboratory evaluation - urinalysis
Up to two approximately 2 months
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Therapeutic Regimen
EXPERIMENTALIntermediate dose
EXPERIMENTALLow dose
EXPERIMENTALPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have a positive skin prick test for birch and hazel and alder allergen.
- Positive skin prick test to positive histamine control
- Negative skin prick test to negative control
- Specific IgE for birch as documented by radioallergosorbent or equivalent test with class ≥ 2
- History of at least 1 season of moderate to severe seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis due to an IgE - mediated allergy to pollen from birch, hazel, and alder
- Patients must score on the disease severity questionnaire as moderate or severe.
- Males or non-pregnant, non-lactating females
- Patients who are normally active and otherwise judged to be in good health
- Patients must be willing and able to attend required study visits.
- Patients must be able to follow instructions.
- Patients must be willing and able to give written informed consent and must provide this consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Acute or subacute atopic dermatitis and/or urticaria factitia and/or urticaria due to physical or chemical influence and/or chronic dermatitis
- Moderate to severe asthma
- Visual inspection of the forearms indicates potential problems with the conduct or interpretation of the skin prick test; both forearms must be available for testing.
- History or presence of diabetes, cancer or any clinically significant cardiac, metabolic, renal, or hematologic diseases or disorders
- Recent clinically significant history of hepatic, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, venereal, neurologic or psychiatric diseases or disorders
- Any clinically significant abnormal laboratory value at Visit 1
- Perennial allergens: clinically relevant sensitivity to house dust mites, molds, and epithelia
- Patient has clinically relevant sensitivity to the following summer/autumn season flowering plants: plantain, orache, nettle, mugwort, Parietaria judaica, Bermuda grass, or ragweed.
- Secondary alteration at the affected organ
- History of autoimmune diseases and/or rheumatoid diseases
- Patient is taking ß-blockers for any indication including eye drops
- Patient who is not allowed to receive adrenalin
- Patients in whom tyrosine metabolism is disturbed
- Presence of a disease with a pathogenesis interfering with the immune response and patient has received medication which could influence the results of this study
- Acute or significant chronic infection
- +13 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Allied Research International Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 1N2, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Deepen Patel, MD
Allied Research International Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2005
First Posted
July 12, 2005
Study Start
July 7, 2005
Primary Completion
September 15, 2005
Study Completion
September 15, 2005
Last Updated
February 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02