Aripiprazole in Children and Adolescents With Bipolar I Disorder
A Phase III Trial to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Aripiprazole in Child and Adolescent Patients With Bipolar I Disorder, Manic or Mixed Episode With or Without Psychotic Features
1 other identifier
interventional
296
1 country
53
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to test the safety and efficacy of two doses of aripiprazole in child and adolescent patients with bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2005
53 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2005
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2007
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 21, 2012
CompletedMay 21, 2012
April 1, 2012
1.9 years
May 9, 2005
August 11, 2011
April 19, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Total Score at Week 4
Change from Baseline to Week 4 in Y-MRS total score, using the last observation carried forward. Assessments performed at baseline and weekly through the acute phase (Week 4). (Also performed at Weeks 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 through the continuation phase.) The Y-MRS consists of 11 items assessing the core symptoms of mania. Each item has 5 grades of severity. Minimum score on the scale is 0 (absent or normal). Maximum score on the scale is 60 (worse outcome or more severe symptoms).
Baseline and Week 4
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Change in Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Total Score at Week 30
Baseline and Week 30
Change in Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) Total Score at Week 4
Baseline and Week 4
Change in Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Bipolar Version (CGI-BP) Severity Mania Score at Week 4
Baseline and Week 4
Change in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) Total Score at Week 4
Baseline and Week 4
Change in General Behavior Inventory Scale (GBI) Total Parent/Guardian Version Mania Score at Week 4
Baseline and Week 4
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORAripiprazole 10 mg tablet
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORAripiprazole 30 mg tablet
3
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo
Interventions
Treatment Arm 1 (10 mg treatment arm): Aripiprazole 2 mg QD for 2 days, aripiprazole 5 mg QD for 2 days, and aripiprazole 10 mg QD as the target dose starting on Day 5. Subjects remained on the 10 mg dose for the remainder of the treatment period Subjects reached their target dose through a forced titration schedule and proceeded with treatment at their target dose until Week 4. If the subject reached Week 4, he or she continued into the Extension Phase, a 6-month double-blind treatment period, beginning at the same dose taken at the end of the Acute Phase.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child and adolescent patients with bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode with or without psychotic features
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with certain other psychological disorders
- Patients with a co-morbid serious, uncontrolled systemic illness
- Patients with significant risk of committing suicide
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (53)
Local Institution
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Local Institution
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Local Institution
National City, California, United States
Local Institution
Orange, California, United States
Local Institution
Pasadena, California, United States
Local Institution
Sacramento, California, United States
Local Institution
San Diego, California, United States
Local Institution
Stanford, California, United States
Local Institution
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Local Institution
Altamonte Springs, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Hialeah, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Miami, Florida, United States
Local Institution
North Miami, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Tampa, Florida, United States
Local Institution
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Local Institution
Smyrna, Georgia, United States
Local Institution
Boise, Idaho, United States
Local Institution
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Libertyville, Illinois, United States
Local Institution
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Local Institution
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Local Institution
Newton, Kansas, United States
Local Institution
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Local Institution
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Local Institution
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Medford, Massachusetts, United States
Local Institution
Clinton Township, Michigan, United States
Local Institution
Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States
Local Institution
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Local Institution
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Local Institution
Elmsford, New York, United States
Local Institution
New York, New York, United States
Local Institution
Rochester, New York, United States
Local Institution
Stony Brook, New York, United States
Local Institution
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Local Institution
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Local Institution
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Local Institution
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Local Institution
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Local Institution
Bellaire, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Houston, Texas, United States
Local Institution
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Local Institution
Herndon, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Local Institution
Kirkland, Washington, United States
Local Institution
Spokane, Washington, United States
Local Institution
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Related Publications (4)
Youngstrom E, Zhao J, Mankoski R, Forbes RA, Marcus RM, Carson W, McQuade R, Findling RL. Clinical significance of treatment effects with aripiprazole versus placebo in a study of manic or mixed episodes associated with pediatric bipolar I disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2013 Mar;23(2):72-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2012.0024. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
PMID: 23480324DERIVEDFindling RL, Correll CU, Nyilas M, Forbes RA, McQuade RD, Jin N, Ivanova S, Mankoski R, Carson WH, Carlson GA. Aripiprazole for the treatment of pediatric bipolar I disorder: a 30-week, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Bipolar Disord. 2013 Mar;15(2):138-49. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12042.
PMID: 23437959DERIVEDMankoski R, Zhao J, Carson WH, Mathew SJ, Forbes RA. Young mania rating scale line item analysis in pediatric subjects with bipolar I disorder treated with aripiprazole in a short-term, double-blind, randomized study. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011 Aug;21(4):359-64. doi: 10.1089/cap.2010.0100. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PMID: 21823911DERIVEDFindling RL, Nyilas M, Forbes RA, McQuade RD, Jin N, Iwamoto T, Ivanova S, Carson WH, Chang K. Acute treatment of pediatric bipolar I disorder, manic or mixed episode, with aripiprazole: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;70(10):1441-51. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05164yel.
PMID: 19906348DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Primary efficacy endpoint is change from baseline in Y-MRS total score. Only randomized subjects with both baseline and 1+ post-baseline were included in primary efficacy analysis so # randomized is different from # included in the efficacy analysis.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Andy Forbes
- Organization
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Margaretta Nyilas, MD
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2005
First Posted
May 10, 2005
Study Start
March 1, 2005
Primary Completion
February 1, 2007
Study Completion
February 1, 2007
Last Updated
May 21, 2012
Results First Posted
May 21, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-04