NCT00108160

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if mupirocin 2% in polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Treatment Arm\] is effective in preventing moderate to severe re-infection with Staphylococcus aureus compared with treatment with polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment \[Placebo Arm\].

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
146

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2005

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2005

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 14, 2005

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2005

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2012

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 4, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 16, 2014

Status Verified

March 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

April 14, 2005

Results QC Date

December 16, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 20, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

mupirocinprevention and controls. aureus

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Re-infection With S. Aureus

    During the study, patients with prior well-documented infections with Staphylococcus aureus who developed new signs and symptoms of infection, met standardized clinical criteria for infection, and had S. aureus isolated on culture were considered to have re-infection with S. aureus. The number of S. aureus re-infections were compared in the mupirocin ointment (Treatment Arm) versus polyethylene glycol ointment (Placebo Arm) for all participants enrolled in the study and in participants who completed each study time point (visit)

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Acquisition of New S. Aureus Strains

    18 months

Other Outcomes (1)

  • S. Aureus Re-infections (New or Recurrent)

    18 months

Study Arms (2)

Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment arm or active comparator \[mupirocin 2% polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment\] will be compared with its placebo comparator \[polyethylene glycol (PEF) in patients with a prior history of S. aureus infection. Drug or placebo will be applied topically to nares and/or wounds twice daily for 14 days at 3 month intervals for up to 18 months

Drug: Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Treatment arm or active comparator \[mupirocin 2% polyethylene glycol (PEG) ointment\] will be compared with its placebo comparator \[polyethylene glycol (PEF) in patients with a prior history of S. aureus infection. Drug or placebo will be applied topically to nares and/or wounds twice daily for 14 days at 3 month intervals for up to 18 months

Drug: Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

Interventions

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of new (recurrent) S. aureus infection will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Also known as: Bactroban ointment, Mupirocin 2% in Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) Ointment
Mupirocin Ointment [Treatment]

The impact of the treatment arm versus placebo arm on development of S. aureus re-infections will be assessed as the primary end point. Change in S. aureus strains (MSSA versus MRSA) will be assessed as the secondary end point.

Also known as: PEG Ointment
Polyethylene Glycol Ointment [Placebo]

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients who receive care at Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, University of Michigan Medical Center, or St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ypsilanti who have been hospitalized for documented S. aureus infection will be eligible for enrollment. Staphylococcal infections may be community or hospital-acquired. Patients with S. aureus infection will be identified on a daily basis with the assistance of the Infection Control Practitioner, the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, the Infectious Diseases Consultation Services, and Infectious Diseases physicians caring for patients in their offices.
  • Patients will provide written informed consent. The patient's guardian or next of kin will be contacted for informed consent in the event that the patient is incapable of doing so.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are unable to cooperate with treatment or follow-up.
  • Patients who are not likely to survive beyond one month or those who are transferred back to another acute care hospital.
  • Patients who require treatment with rifampin will be excluded since this drug is effective in decolonization of some staphylococcal carriers.
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to mupirocin ointment or polyethylene glycol base.
  • Patients with ulcers obviously related to pressure will be excluded because they are frequently large, difficult to keep clean, and infections are difficult to diagnose.
  • Patients with small vascular or neuropathic ulcers \< 3 cm in circumference and \< 2 cm in depth may be enrolled.
  • Pregnant women.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48113, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Staphylococcal Infections

Interventions

TherapeuticsMupirocinPolyethylene GlycolsOintments

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and MycosesInfections

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epoxy CompoundsEthers, CyclicEthersOrganic ChemicalsPyransHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsFatty AcidsLipidsEthylene GlycolsGlycolsAlcoholsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and AgricultureDosage FormsPharmaceutical Preparations

Limitations and Caveats

The study is underpowered to detect differences between the two treatment arms. We achieved only 75% of target enrollment, and 41.1% dropped out before reaching a primary endpoint. Our re-infection rate was also lower than anticipated (14.4%).

Results Point of Contact

Title
Suzanne F. Bradley, M.D.
Organization
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

Study Officials

  • Suzanne Bradley, MD

    VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2005

First Posted

April 15, 2005

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion

August 1, 2012

Study Completion

August 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 16, 2014

Results First Posted

February 4, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-03

Locations