NCT00101933

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research is to study the safety and effectiveness of bilateral stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus as adjunctive therapy for reducing the frequency of seizures in adults diagnosed with epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization, that are refractory to antiepileptic medications.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
157

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2003

Longer than P75 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2003

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 18, 2005

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 19, 2005

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2008

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 21, 2013

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

March 22, 2018

Status Verified

February 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.5 years

First QC Date

January 18, 2005

Results QC Date

October 1, 2012

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Deep brain stimulation, DBS, SANTE

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Primary Analysis: Change in Seizure Rate

    A protocol-prespecified generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was used to evaluate the treatment effect on seizure frequency. The final GEE model for the primary objective evaluation included treatment effect, log of the baseline seizure count, log of age, visit (categorical), treatment-by-visit interaction (categorical), and the offset (the number of days the diary was recorded in each month).

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

  • Alternative Primary Analysis: Change in Seizure Rate

    A generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis was used to evaluate the treatment effect on seizure frequency. With one outlier subject removed, the GEE model for this alternative analysis included treatment effect, log of the baseline seizure count, log of age, visit (categorical), and the offset (the number of days the diary was recorded in each month).

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Adverse Events Experienced With the Medtronic DBS System

    Through Year 2 of the long-term follow-up phase

  • Incidence of Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP)

    Inclusive of all study follow-up after device implantation (mean follow-up 3.7 years)

  • Seizure Responder Rate

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

  • Change in Percentage of Days Seizure-free

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

  • Percentage Change in the Maximum Length of Seizure-free Intervals

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change in Most Severe Seizures

    Through the end of the three-month blinded phase

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Active Stimulation

Device: Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy

2

SHAM COMPARATOR

No Stimulation

Device: Medtronic DBS Therapy for epilepsy

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

  • Partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. The final determination shall be made by the Investigator based on a clinical description of the seizures and previous diagnostic testing that includes, at a minimum, video/clinical EEG that captured at least one ictal event.
  • Anticipated average of 6 or more partial-onset seizures (with or without secondary generalized seizures) per month during the Baseline Phase, with no more than 30 days between seizures during the Baseline Phase.
  • Refractory to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients will be considered refractory if they have failed at least three AEDs due to lack of efficacy.
  • Receiving one to four currently marketed AEDs
  • Be between 18 and 65 years of age at the time of lead implant
  • Multilobar (\>3 different lobes) anatomic areas of seizure onset
  • Symptomatic generalized epilepsy
  • Previous diagnosis of psychogenic/non-epileptic seizures
  • Presence of implanted electrical stimulation medical device anywhere in the body (e.g., cardiac pacemakers, spinal cord stimulator) or any metallic implants in the head (e.g., aneurysm clip, cochlear implant). Vagal nerve stimulators are allowed if the device has been turned off for at least 30 days prior to the Baseline Week -12 visit and the patient agrees to have the generator explanted prior to or at the time of the Kinetra Neurostimulator implant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Miller PM, Gross RE. Wire tethering or 'bowstringing' as a long-term hardware-related complication of deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(6):353-9. doi: 10.1159/000236369. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

    PMID: 19752594BACKGROUND
  • Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, Oommen K, Osorio I, Nazzaro J, Labar D, Kaplitt M, Sperling M, Sandok E, Neal J, Handforth A, Stern J, DeSalles A, Chung S, Shetter A, Bergen D, Bakay R, Henderson J, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld W, Youkilis A, Marks W, Garcia P, Barbaro N, Fountain N, Bazil C, Goodman R, McKhann G, Babu Krishnamurthy K, Papavassiliou S, Epstein C, Pollard J, Tonder L, Grebin J, Coffey R, Graves N; SANTE Study Group. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):899-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.

  • Troster AI, Meador KJ, Irwin CP, Fisher RS; SANTE Study Group. Memory and mood outcomes after anterior thalamic stimulation for refractory partial epilepsy. Seizure. 2017 Feb;45:133-141. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.12.014. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

  • Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry TR, Gross RE, Nazzaro JM, Labar D, Sperling MR, Sharan A, Sandok E, Handforth A, Stern JM, Chung S, Henderson JM, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld WE, Garcia P, Barbaro NM, Fountain NB, Elias WJ, Goodman RR, Pollard JR, Troster AI, Irwin CP, Lambrecht K, Graves N, Fisher R; SANTE Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015 Mar 10;84(10):1017-25. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001334. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

No limitations leading to unreliable data were identified.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jim Vollhaber, Clinical Study Manager
Organization
Medtronic Neuromodulation

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2005

First Posted

January 19, 2005

Study Start

December 1, 2003

Primary Completion

June 1, 2008

Study Completion

October 1, 2017

Last Updated

March 22, 2018

Results First Posted

January 21, 2013

Record last verified: 2018-02