Study Stopped
resource and prioritization change as Network transition to a new funding cycle
Long-term Effectiveness of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
E-CARE
9 other identifiers
observational
215
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Effort (CARE) trial is a research study designed to evaluate whether the addition of a second surgical procedure in addition to a procedure for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP) affects the rates of urinary incontinence. This study will follow women in the CARE study for 10 years from the time of the surgery to compare success and complication rates in the two groups. Recruitment into this study is open only to women that already participated in CARE. Recruitment into CARE is closed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2004
Longer than P75 for all trials
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 10, 2004
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 13, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 22, 2021
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
December 1, 2020
7.1 years
December 10, 2004
December 10, 2020
February 24, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (42)
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
24 months
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
3 year
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
4 year
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
5 year
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
6 year
Number of Participants With Symptomatic Failure
Symptom of bulge on Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, interval prolapse surgery, or pessary used after index surgery
7 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
24 months
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
3 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
4 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
5 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
6 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Original Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex decends \>= 2 cm, or the anterior or posterior vaginal wall decends \>1 cm beyond the hymen
7 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
24 months
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
3 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
4 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
5 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
6 year
Number of Participants With Anatomic Failure (Updated Definition)
Reoperation or pessary for POP or POP-Q measurements as follows: Vaginal apex descends below the upper third of the vagina, or the anterior (Ba) or posterior (Bp) vaginal wall prolapses beyond the hymen
7 year
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
24 months
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
3 year
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
4 year
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
5 year
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
6 year
Number of Participants With Composite Failure
Anatomic failure (updated definition) or symptomatic failure
7 year
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
24 months
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
3 year
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
4 year
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
5 year
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
6 year
Number of Participants Considered as Failures For Urinary Incontinence Using the Incontinence Severity Index
Failure is indicated by a score of 3 or greater on the Incontinence Severity Index (formerly called Hunskaar). The score is calculated as the product of the answers to two incontinence-related questions resulting in a range from 0 to 12 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms). A score of 3 or greater corresponds to a severity classification of moderate, severe, or very severe.
7 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
24 months
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
3 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
4 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
5 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
6 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Prevention
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory, receipt of interval anti-incontinence surgery, or receipt of an urethral bulking agent injection for SUI
7 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
24 months
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
3 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
4 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
5 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
6 year
Number of Participants With Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
One or more SUI symptoms reported on the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory
7 year
Study Arms (2)
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy with no Burch colposuspension
Participants had an Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy without Burch colposuspension for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy with Burch Colposuspension
Participants had an Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy with Burch colposuspension for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse
Eligibility Criteria
Women who completed the CARE study
You may qualify if:
- Women enrolled in CARE
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Subjects who, at the time of enrollment into E-CARE, are long-term residents of a skilled nursing facility (that is, residency is not limited to short-term rehabilitation).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Networklead
- University of Iowacollaborator
- Baylor College of Medicinecollaborator
- Loyola Universitycollaborator
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hillcollaborator
- Johns Hopkins Universitycollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)collaborator
Study Sites (8)
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233-7333, United States
USCD Medical Center
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
Kaiser Permanente
San Diego, California, 92120, United States
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Magee-Womens Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3180, United States
Related Publications (1)
Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Cundiff G, Richter H, Gantz M, Fine P, Menefee S, Ridgeway B, Visco A, Warren LK, Zhang M, Meikle S. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013 May 15;309(19):2016-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.4919.
PMID: 23677313DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Marie Gantz
- Organization
- RTI International
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ingrid Nygaard, MD
University of Utah
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 10, 2004
First Posted
December 13, 2004
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
June 1, 2011
Study Completion
June 1, 2011
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Results First Posted
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12