NCT00096447

Brief Summary

This phase II trial is studying how well lapatinib works in treating patients with recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer. Lapatinib may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking the enzymes necessary for their growth

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
31

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2004

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2004

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 9, 2004

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 10, 2004

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2011

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

September 18, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

November 9, 2004

Results QC Date

June 3, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 22, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Percentage of Patients With Progression-free Survival > 6 Months

    Progression is defined according to RECIST v1.0 as at least a 20% increase in the sum of LD target lesions taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since study entry, the appearance of one or more new lesions, death due to disease without prior objective documentation of progression, global deterioration in health status attributable to the disease requiring a change in therapy without objective evidence of progression, or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

    For those patients whose disease can be evaluated by physical examination, progression was assessed prior to each 28-day cycle. CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle, for up to 5 years.

  • Frequency and Severity of Adverse Events as Assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 3.0

    The frequency and severity of all toxicities are tabulated.

    Every cycle during treatment and 30 days after the last cycle of therapy.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Patients With Tumor Response

    For those patients whose disease can be evaluated by physical examination, response was assessed prior to each 28-day cycle. CT scan or MRI if used to follow lesion for measurable disease every other cycle, for up to 5 years.

  • Duration of Progression-free Survival

    Every other cycle during treatment, then every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every six months for the next three years and then annually for the next 5 years.

  • Overall Survival

    From study entry to death or last contact, up to 5 years.

  • Prognostic Factors (Performance Status)

    Baseline

  • Prognostic Factor (Histologic Grade)

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Treatment (lapatinib ditosylate)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients receive oral lapatinib once daily on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Drug: lapatinib ditosylate

Interventions

Also known as: GSK572016, GW-572016, GW2016, Lapatinib, Tykerb
Treatment (lapatinib ditosylate)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Histologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma
  • Recurrent or persistent disease
  • Histologic confirmation of the original primary tumor is required
  • Refractory to curative therapy or standard treatments
  • Measurable disease
  • At least 1 unidimensionally measurable lesion ≥ 20 mm by conventional techniques, including palpation, plain x-ray, CT scan, or MRI OR ≥ 10 mm by spiral CT scan
  • Must have at least 1 target lesion
  • Tumors within a previously irradiated field are considered non-target lesions
  • Disease in an irradiated field as the only site of measurable disease is considered a target lesion provided there has been clear progression of the lesion since the completion of prior radiotherapy
  • Must have received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for endometrial carcinoma
  • Initial therapy may have included high-dose therapy, consolidation, or extended therapy administered after surgical or non-surgical assessment
  • No more than 1 additional prior cytotoxic regimen for recurrent or persistent disease
  • Tumor accessible to guided core needle or fine needle biopsy
  • Ineligible for a higher priority GOG protocol (e.g., any active GOG phase III protocol for the same patient population)
  • Performance status - GOG 0-2 (for patients who have received 1 prior treatment regimen)
  • +34 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Gynecologic Oncology Group

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19103, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Neoplasms

Interventions

LapatinibN-(3-chloro-4-((3-fluorobenzyl)oxy)phenyl-6-(5-((methylsulfonyl)ethyl)aminomethyl)-2-furyl)-4-quinazolinamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

QuinazolinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

The clinical trial was a two-stage design, accruing approximately 25 patients in each stage. Results from a planned interim futility analysis resulted in the early closure of the study. This study stopped early for lack of treatment efficacy.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Angela M. Kuras, Associate Director of Data Management
Organization
NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center - Buffalo

Study Officials

  • Kimberly Leslie

    Gynecologic Oncology Group

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 9, 2004

First Posted

November 10, 2004

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion

March 1, 2011

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 24, 2019

Results First Posted

September 18, 2015

Record last verified: 2019-07

Locations