National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Screening
NLST
6 other identifiers
interventional
53,454
1 country
33
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Effective screening tests should help doctors detect lung cancer early and plan curative treatment. It is not yet known whether low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) screening is more effective than chest radiography (CXR) screening in reducing death from lung cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of LDCT scan with that of CXR in screening individuals who are at high risk for developing lung cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 lung-cancer
Started Aug 2002
Longer than P75 for phase_3 lung-cancer
33 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 6, 2012
CompletedMay 20, 2014
October 1, 2012
8.2 years
October 3, 2002
May 30, 2012
May 2, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lung Cancer Deaths
Lung cancer deaths confirmed in participants by Endpoint Verification if available, otherwise by death certificate.
All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Deaths From All Causes in All Randomized Participants.
All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years.
Lung Cancer Diagnoses
All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years
Complications of Diagnostic Evaluation Following a Positive Screening Test.
One year from screening examination
T0 (Baseline) Screening Results
T0 (at study entry)
T1 Screening Results
T1 (one year after entry)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Low-Dose CT
EXPERIMENTALChest X-ray
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
A LDCT is a computerized tomography image with low-dose technique without contrast. The scan is done from the neck to the diaphragm in one breath-hold.
The chest x-ray in this study was a single posterior-anterior film done with the participant upright.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 55-74 years (pack-years = packs per day \* years smoked)
- or more pack-years of cigarette smoking history
- Former smokers: quit smoking within the previous 15 years
- Ability to lie on the back with arms raised over the head
- Signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Metallic implants or devices in the chest or back, such as pacemakers or Harrington fixation rods
- Treatment for, or evidence of, any cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (with the exception of transitional cell carcinoma in situ or bladder carcinoma in situ) in the 5 years prior to eligibility assessment
- History of lung cancer
- History of removal of any portion of the lung, excluding needle biopsy
- Requirement for home oxygen supplementation
- Participation in another cancer screening trial
- Participation in a cancer prevention study, other than a smoking cessation study
- Unexplained weight loss of more than 15 pounds in the 12 months prior to eligibility assessment
- Recent hemoptysis
- Pneumonia or acute respiratory infection treated with antibiotics in the 12 weeks prior to eligibility assessment
- Chest CT examination in the 18 months prior to eligibility assessment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (33)
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
Univeristy of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92093-0658, United States
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781, United States
University of Colorado Denver
Denver, Colorado, 80262, United States
Georgetown University Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612-9497, United States
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Pacific Health Research & Education Institute
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1011, United States
Jewish Hopsital Heart and Lung Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Ochsner Medical Foundation Hospital
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0942, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
University of Minnesota School of Public Health
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002, United States
Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Hamilton
Hamilton, New Jersey, 08690, United States
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27106, United States
St Elizabeth Health Center
Youngstown, Ohio, 44504, United States
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15236, United States
Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908-4735, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838, United States
University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States
University of Utah Health Sciences Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449, United States
Related Publications (28)
National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, Church TR, Fagerstrom RM, Galen B, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Goldin J, Gohagan JK, Hillman B, Jaffe C, Kramer BS, Lynch D, Marcus PM, Schnall M, Sullivan DC, Sullivan D, Zylak CJ. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091808. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
PMID: 21045183BACKGROUNDCody DD, Kim HJ, Cagnon CH, Larke FJ, McNitt-Gray MM, Kruger RL, Flynn MJ, Seibert JA, Judy PF, Wu X. Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1539-46. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3268.
PMID: 20489094BACKGROUNDClark KW, Gierada DS, Marquez G, Moore SM, Maffitt DR, Moulton JD, Wolfsberger MA, Koppel P, Phillips SR, Prior FW. Collecting 48,000 CT exams for the lung screening study of the National Lung Screening Trial. J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):667-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9145-9. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
PMID: 18777192BACKGROUNDGierada DS, Garg K, Nath H, Strollo DC, Fagerstrom RM, Ford MB. CT quality assurance in the lung screening study component of the National Lung Screening Trial: implications for multicenter imaging trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):419-24. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1995.
PMID: 19620438BACKGROUNDNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
PMID: 21714641RESULTSingh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS, Gierada DS, Garg K, Sun Y, Nath PH. Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):263-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101254. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
PMID: 21248232RESULTNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Clapp JD, Clingan KL, Gareen IF, Lynch DA, Marcus PM, Pinsky PF. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 1;102(23):1771-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq434. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
PMID: 21119104RESULTPark ER, Ostroff JS, Rakowski W, Gareen IF, Diefenbach MA, Feibelmann S, Rigotti NA. Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Jun;37(3):268-79. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9112-9. Epub 2009 Aug 27.
PMID: 19711141RESULTGierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M, Fagerstrom RM, Church TR, Nath H, Garg K, Strollo DC. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):265-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461062097. Epub 2007 Nov 16.
PMID: 18024436RESULTMarcinkiewicz AM, Buchwald M, Shanbhag A, Bednarski BP, Killekar A, Miller RJH, Builoff V, Lemley M, Berman DS, Dey D, Slomka PJ. AI for Multistructure Incidental Findings and Mortality Prediction at Chest CT in Lung Cancer Screening. Radiology. 2024 Sep;312(3):e240541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240541.
PMID: 39287522DERIVEDVenkadesh KV, Aleef TA, Scholten ET, Saghir Z, Silva M, Sverzellati N, Pastorino U, van Ginneken B, Prokop M, Jacobs C. Prior CT Improves Deep Learning for Malignancy Risk Estimation of Screening-detected Pulmonary Nodules. Radiology. 2023 Aug;308(2):e223308. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223308.
PMID: 37526548DERIVEDXu K, Khan MS, Li TZ, Gao R, Terry JG, Huo Y, Lasko TA, Carr JJ, Maldonado F, Landman BA, Sandler KL. AI Body Composition in Lung Cancer Screening: Added Value Beyond Lung Cancer Detection. Radiology. 2023 Jul;308(1):e222937. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222937.
PMID: 37489991DERIVEDKinsey CM, Billatos E, Mori V, Tonelli B, Cole BF, Duan F, Marques H, de la Bruere I, Onieva J, San Jose Estepar R, Cleveland A, Idelkope D, Stevenson C, Bates JHT, Aberle D, Spira A, Washko G, San Jose Estepar R. A simple assessment of lung nodule location for reduction in unnecessary invasive procedures. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4207-4216. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3093.
PMID: 34422349DERIVEDTammemagi MC, Ten Haaf K, Toumazis I, Kong CY, Han SS, Jeon J, Commins J, Riley T, Meza R. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204.
PMID: 30821827DERIVEDWong JYY, Bassig BA, Seow WJ, Hu W, Ji BT, Blair A, Silverman DT, Lan Q. Lung cancer risk in welders and foundry workers with a history of heavy smoking in the USA: The National Lung Screening Trial. Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;74(6):440-448. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104168. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
PMID: 28069970DERIVEDPatz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C, Pinsky P, Kramer BS, Aberle DR. Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):590-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
PMID: 27009070DERIVEDMarcus PM, Doria-Rose VP, Gareen IF, Brewer B, Clingan K, Keating K, Rosenbaum J, Rozjabek HM, Rathmell J, Sicks J, Miller AB. Did death certificates and a death review process agree on lung cancer cause of death in the National Lung Screening Trial? Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):434-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774516638345. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
PMID: 27006427DERIVEDTanner NT, Gebregziabher M, Hughes Halbert C, Payne E, Egede LE, Silvestri GA. Racial Differences in Outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial. Implications for Widespread Implementation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15;192(2):200-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0259OC.
PMID: 25928649DERIVEDClark MA, Gorelick JJ, Sicks JD, Park ER, Graham AL, Abrams DB, Gareen IF. The Relations Between False Positive and Negative Screens and Smoking Cessation and Relapse in the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for Public Health. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jan;18(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv037. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
PMID: 25746779DERIVEDBlack WC. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Mar;30(2):79-87. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000136.
PMID: 25635704DERIVEDBlack WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, Sicks JD, Keeler EB, Aberle DR, Naeim A, Church TR, Silvestri GA, Gorelick J, Gatsonis C; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1793-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312547.
PMID: 25372087DERIVEDOsinusi A, Kohli A, Marti MM, Nelson A, Zhang X, Meissner EG, Silk R, Townsend K, Pang PS, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Fauci AS, Masur H, Kottilil S. Re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection after relapse: an open-label pilot study. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):634-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-1211.
PMID: 25364884DERIVEDPinsky PF, Gierada DS, Hocking W, Patz EF Jr, Kramer BS. National Lung Screening Trial findings by age: Medicare-eligible versus under-65 population. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):627-33. doi: 10.7326/M14-1484.
PMID: 25199624DERIVEDAberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD, Black WC, Brewer B, Church TR, Clingan KL, Duan F, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis CA, Gierada DS, Jain A, Jones GC, Mahon I, Marcus PM, Rathmell JM, Sicks J; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208962.
PMID: 24004119DERIVEDNational Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Clingan KL, Duan F, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gierada DS, Jones GC, Mahon I, Marcus PM, Sicks JD, Jain A, Baum S. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):1980-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209120.
PMID: 23697514DERIVEDSingh SP, Gierada DS, Pinsky P, Sanders C, Fineberg N, Sun Y, Lynch D, Nath H. Reader variability in identifying pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs from the national lung screening trial. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Jul;27(4):249-54. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318256951e.
PMID: 22627615DERIVEDMatsuoka S, Washko GR, Dransfield MT, Yamashiro T, San Jose Estepar R, Diaz A, Silverman EK, Patz S, Hatabu H. Quantitative CT measurement of cross-sectional area of small pulmonary vessel in COPD: correlations with emphysema and airflow limitation. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan;17(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Sep 30.
PMID: 19796970DERIVEDDransfield MT, Washko GR, Foreman MG, Estepar RS, Reilly J, Bailey WC. Gender differences in the severity of CT emphysema in COPD. Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):464-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0863. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
PMID: 17573503DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
NLST utilized institutions with special expertise. The "healthy volunteer" effect may apply. Scanners are now more technologically advanced. Ongoing LDCT screening may reduce the rate of lung cancer deaths more than three rounds done in NLST.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Christine D. Berg, M.D.
- Organization
- Early Detection Research Group, NCI, NIH
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Christine D. Berg, MD
NCI - Early Detection Research Group
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Denise R. Aberle, MD
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2002
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
August 1, 2002
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
May 20, 2014
Results First Posted
July 6, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-10