NCT00047385

Brief Summary

RATIONALE: Effective screening tests should help doctors detect lung cancer early and plan curative treatment. It is not yet known whether low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) screening is more effective than chest radiography (CXR) screening in reducing death from lung cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of LDCT scan with that of CXR in screening individuals who are at high risk for developing lung cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53,454

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 lung-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2002

Longer than P75 for phase_3 lung-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

33 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2002

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 3, 2002

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 27, 2003

Completed
7.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 6, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2014

Status Verified

October 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

8.2 years

First QC Date

October 3, 2002

Results QC Date

May 30, 2012

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

small cell lung cancernon-small cell lung cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lung Cancer Deaths

    Lung cancer deaths confirmed in participants by Endpoint Verification if available, otherwise by death certificate.

    All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years.

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Deaths From All Causes in All Randomized Participants.

    All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years.

  • Lung Cancer Diagnoses

    All events through December 31, 2009; median follow-up 6.5 years

  • Complications of Diagnostic Evaluation Following a Positive Screening Test.

    One year from screening examination

  • T0 (Baseline) Screening Results

    T0 (at study entry)

  • T1 Screening Results

    T1 (one year after entry)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Low-Dose CT

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: low-dose helical computed tomography

Chest X-ray

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: chest radiography

Interventions

A LDCT is a computerized tomography image with low-dose technique without contrast. The scan is done from the neck to the diaphragm in one breath-hold.

Also known as: LDCT
Low-Dose CT

The chest x-ray in this study was a single posterior-anterior film done with the participant upright.

Also known as: CXR
Chest X-ray

Eligibility Criteria

Age55 Years - 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 55-74 years (pack-years = packs per day \* years smoked)
  • or more pack-years of cigarette smoking history
  • Former smokers: quit smoking within the previous 15 years
  • Ability to lie on the back with arms raised over the head
  • Signed informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • Metallic implants or devices in the chest or back, such as pacemakers or Harrington fixation rods
  • Treatment for, or evidence of, any cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ (with the exception of transitional cell carcinoma in situ or bladder carcinoma in situ) in the 5 years prior to eligibility assessment
  • History of lung cancer
  • History of removal of any portion of the lung, excluding needle biopsy
  • Requirement for home oxygen supplementation
  • Participation in another cancer screening trial
  • Participation in a cancer prevention study, other than a smoking cessation study
  • Unexplained weight loss of more than 15 pounds in the 12 months prior to eligibility assessment
  • Recent hemoptysis
  • Pneumonia or acute respiratory infection treated with antibiotics in the 12 weeks prior to eligibility assessment
  • Chest CT examination in the 18 months prior to eligibility assessment

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (33)

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

Location

Univeristy of California, San Diego

La Jolla, California, 92093-0658, United States

Location

Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, UCLA

Los Angeles, California, 90095-1781, United States

Location

University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado, 80262, United States

Location

Georgetown University Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic

Jacksonville, Florida, 32224, United States

Location

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Tampa, Florida, 33612-9497, United States

Location

Emory University School of Medicine

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Pacific Health Research & Education Institute

Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813, United States

Location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1011, United States

Location

Jewish Hopsital Heart and Lung Institute

Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States

Location

Ochsner Medical Foundation Hospital

New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121, United States

Location

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States

Location

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States

Location

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0942, United States

Location

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

University of Minnesota School of Public Health

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location

Mayo Clinic Cancer Center

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

Location

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States

Location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756-0002, United States

Location

Cancer Institute of New Jersey at Hamilton

Hamilton, New Jersey, 08690, United States

Location

Wake Forest University

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27106, United States

Location

St Elizabeth Health Center

Youngstown, Ohio, 44504, United States

Location

University of Pennsylvania Medical Center

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15236, United States

Location

Brown University, Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02908-4735, United States

Location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838, United States

Location

University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, United States

Location

University of Utah Health Sciences Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112, United States

Location

Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, 54449, United States

Location

Related Publications (28)

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, Church TR, Fagerstrom RM, Galen B, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Goldin J, Gohagan JK, Hillman B, Jaffe C, Kramer BS, Lynch D, Marcus PM, Schnall M, Sullivan DC, Sullivan D, Zylak CJ. The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. Radiology. 2011 Jan;258(1):243-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091808. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

    PMID: 21045183BACKGROUND
  • Cody DD, Kim HJ, Cagnon CH, Larke FJ, McNitt-Gray MM, Kruger RL, Flynn MJ, Seibert JA, Judy PF, Wu X. Normalized CT dose index of the CT scanners used in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1539-46. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3268.

    PMID: 20489094BACKGROUND
  • Clark KW, Gierada DS, Marquez G, Moore SM, Maffitt DR, Moulton JD, Wolfsberger MA, Koppel P, Phillips SR, Prior FW. Collecting 48,000 CT exams for the lung screening study of the National Lung Screening Trial. J Digit Imaging. 2009 Dec;22(6):667-80. doi: 10.1007/s10278-008-9145-9. Epub 2008 Sep 6.

    PMID: 18777192BACKGROUND
  • Gierada DS, Garg K, Nath H, Strollo DC, Fagerstrom RM, Ford MB. CT quality assurance in the lung screening study component of the National Lung Screening Trial: implications for multicenter imaging trials. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Aug;193(2):419-24. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1995.

    PMID: 19620438BACKGROUND
  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis C, Marcus PM, Sicks JD. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. Epub 2011 Jun 29.

  • Singh S, Pinsky P, Fineberg NS, Gierada DS, Garg K, Sun Y, Nath PH. Evaluation of reader variability in the interpretation of follow-up CT scans at lung cancer screening. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):263-70. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10101254. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Clapp JD, Clingan KL, Gareen IF, Lynch DA, Marcus PM, Pinsky PF. Baseline characteristics of participants in the randomized national lung screening trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 1;102(23):1771-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq434. Epub 2010 Nov 22.

  • Park ER, Ostroff JS, Rakowski W, Gareen IF, Diefenbach MA, Feibelmann S, Rigotti NA. Risk perceptions among participants undergoing lung cancer screening: baseline results from the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Behav Med. 2009 Jun;37(3):268-79. doi: 10.1007/s12160-009-9112-9. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

  • Gierada DS, Pilgram TK, Ford M, Fagerstrom RM, Church TR, Nath H, Garg K, Strollo DC. Lung cancer: interobserver agreement on interpretation of pulmonary findings at low-dose CT screening. Radiology. 2008 Jan;246(1):265-72. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2461062097. Epub 2007 Nov 16.

  • Marcinkiewicz AM, Buchwald M, Shanbhag A, Bednarski BP, Killekar A, Miller RJH, Builoff V, Lemley M, Berman DS, Dey D, Slomka PJ. AI for Multistructure Incidental Findings and Mortality Prediction at Chest CT in Lung Cancer Screening. Radiology. 2024 Sep;312(3):e240541. doi: 10.1148/radiol.240541.

  • Venkadesh KV, Aleef TA, Scholten ET, Saghir Z, Silva M, Sverzellati N, Pastorino U, van Ginneken B, Prokop M, Jacobs C. Prior CT Improves Deep Learning for Malignancy Risk Estimation of Screening-detected Pulmonary Nodules. Radiology. 2023 Aug;308(2):e223308. doi: 10.1148/radiol.223308.

  • Xu K, Khan MS, Li TZ, Gao R, Terry JG, Huo Y, Lasko TA, Carr JJ, Maldonado F, Landman BA, Sandler KL. AI Body Composition in Lung Cancer Screening: Added Value Beyond Lung Cancer Detection. Radiology. 2023 Jul;308(1):e222937. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222937.

  • Kinsey CM, Billatos E, Mori V, Tonelli B, Cole BF, Duan F, Marques H, de la Bruere I, Onieva J, San Jose Estepar R, Cleveland A, Idelkope D, Stevenson C, Bates JHT, Aberle D, Spira A, Washko G, San Jose Estepar R. A simple assessment of lung nodule location for reduction in unnecessary invasive procedures. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Jul;13(7):4207-4216. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3093.

  • Tammemagi MC, Ten Haaf K, Toumazis I, Kong CY, Han SS, Jeon J, Commins J, Riley T, Meza R. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204.

  • Wong JYY, Bassig BA, Seow WJ, Hu W, Ji BT, Blair A, Silverman DT, Lan Q. Lung cancer risk in welders and foundry workers with a history of heavy smoking in the USA: The National Lung Screening Trial. Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;74(6):440-448. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104168. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

  • Patz EF Jr, Greco E, Gatsonis C, Pinsky P, Kramer BS, Aberle DR. Lung cancer incidence and mortality in National Lung Screening Trial participants who underwent low-dose CT prevalence screening: a retrospective cohort analysis of a randomised, multicentre, diagnostic screening trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 May;17(5):590-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00621-X. Epub 2016 Mar 18.

  • Marcus PM, Doria-Rose VP, Gareen IF, Brewer B, Clingan K, Keating K, Rosenbaum J, Rozjabek HM, Rathmell J, Sicks J, Miller AB. Did death certificates and a death review process agree on lung cancer cause of death in the National Lung Screening Trial? Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):434-8. doi: 10.1177/1740774516638345. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

  • Tanner NT, Gebregziabher M, Hughes Halbert C, Payne E, Egede LE, Silvestri GA. Racial Differences in Outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial. Implications for Widespread Implementation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul 15;192(2):200-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0259OC.

  • Clark MA, Gorelick JJ, Sicks JD, Park ER, Graham AL, Abrams DB, Gareen IF. The Relations Between False Positive and Negative Screens and Smoking Cessation and Relapse in the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for Public Health. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Jan;18(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv037. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

  • Black WC. Computed tomography screening for lung cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Thorac Imaging. 2015 Mar;30(2):79-87. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000136.

  • Black WC, Gareen IF, Soneji SS, Sicks JD, Keeler EB, Aberle DR, Naeim A, Church TR, Silvestri GA, Gorelick J, Gatsonis C; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Cost-effectiveness of CT screening in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 6;371(19):1793-802. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312547.

  • Osinusi A, Kohli A, Marti MM, Nelson A, Zhang X, Meissner EG, Silk R, Townsend K, Pang PS, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG, Fauci AS, Masur H, Kottilil S. Re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection after relapse: an open-label pilot study. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):634-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-1211.

  • Pinsky PF, Gierada DS, Hocking W, Patz EF Jr, Kramer BS. National Lung Screening Trial findings by age: Medicare-eligible versus under-65 population. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):627-33. doi: 10.7326/M14-1484.

  • Aberle DR, DeMello S, Berg CD, Black WC, Brewer B, Church TR, Clingan KL, Duan F, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gatsonis CA, Gierada DS, Jain A, Jones GC, Mahon I, Marcus PM, Rathmell JM, Sicks J; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):920-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208962.

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Church TR, Black WC, Aberle DR, Berg CD, Clingan KL, Duan F, Fagerstrom RM, Gareen IF, Gierada DS, Jones GC, Mahon I, Marcus PM, Sicks JD, Jain A, Baum S. Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 May 23;368(21):1980-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1209120.

  • Singh SP, Gierada DS, Pinsky P, Sanders C, Fineberg N, Sun Y, Lynch D, Nath H. Reader variability in identifying pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs from the national lung screening trial. J Thorac Imaging. 2012 Jul;27(4):249-54. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0b013e318256951e.

  • Matsuoka S, Washko GR, Dransfield MT, Yamashiro T, San Jose Estepar R, Diaz A, Silverman EK, Patz S, Hatabu H. Quantitative CT measurement of cross-sectional area of small pulmonary vessel in COPD: correlations with emphysema and airflow limitation. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan;17(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.022. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

  • Dransfield MT, Washko GR, Foreman MG, Estepar RS, Reilly J, Bailey WC. Gender differences in the severity of CT emphysema in COPD. Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):464-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0863. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung NeoplasmsSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Interventions

Tomography, Spiral ComputedDiagnostic Imaging

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Respiratory Tract NeoplasmsThoracic NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesCarcinoma, BronchogenicBronchial Neoplasms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisRadiographic Image EnhancementImage EnhancementPhotographyRadiographyTomography, X-RayTomography

Limitations and Caveats

NLST utilized institutions with special expertise. The "healthy volunteer" effect may apply. Scanners are now more technologically advanced. Ongoing LDCT screening may reduce the rate of lung cancer deaths more than three rounds done in NLST.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Christine D. Berg, M.D.
Organization
Early Detection Research Group, NCI, NIH

Study Officials

  • Christine D. Berg, MD

    NCI - Early Detection Research Group

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Denise R. Aberle, MD

    Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
NIH
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2002

First Posted

January 27, 2003

Study Start

August 1, 2002

Primary Completion

October 1, 2010

Study Completion

October 1, 2010

Last Updated

May 20, 2014

Results First Posted

July 6, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-10

Locations