Heparin Versus Lepirudin Flushes in Preventing Blockage of Venous Access Devices
Heparin vs. Lepirudin Flushes in Preventing Withdrawal Occlusion of Tunneled, Open-Ended Venous Access Devices: A Blinded, Randomized, Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
340
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the effectiveness of two blood thinners, heparin and lepirudin, in preventing withdrawal occlusion (blockage) in a venous access device (VAD). A VAD is a catheter (plastic tube) placed in a vein beneath the collarbone to deliver medication and withdraw blood samples during treatment. The device may become clogged, possibly by formation of a clot around the tip, blocking its opening and making it difficult or impossible to use. The clot can be dissolved by a medication called tPA. The blood thinner heparin has been used for many years to try to prevent the blockage from occurring, but it is still a problem in as many as 25 percent of VADs. This study will test whether a new blood thinner called lepirudin is more effective than heparin in preventing withdrawal occlusion caused by a small clot. Patients 21 years of age and older who are enrolled in NIH protocols at the Clinical Center and who require tunneled, open-ended VADs for their medical care may be eligible for this study. Candidates must expect to receive all of their primary medical care at the Clinical Center during the first 4 weeks after their VAD is inserted and most of their care at the Clinical Center for the next 3 months. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either heparin or lepirudin flushes for the first 3 or 4 weeks after placement of their VAD-the period during which withdrawal occlusion is most likely to occur. After this period, all patients will use routine heparin flushes until the VAD is removed. The patient's VAD will be closely monitored for withdrawal occlusion during the 3- to 4-week test period and will continue to be observed for up to 3 months to check for lasting effects of the blood thinner.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started May 2002
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2002
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 7, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 4, 2008
April 1, 2006
June 7, 2002
March 3, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients must:
- Be greater than or equal to 18 years old.
- Be enrolled in protocols at the Clinical Center.
- Require tunneled, open-ended VADs for their primary care.
- Have their VADs inserted at the Clinical Center in Interventional Radiology.
- Intend to receive the majority of their primary medical care at the Clinical Center during the first 4 months after their VAD is inserted.
- Have serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.5 mg/dL or a glomerular filtration rate greater than or equal to 50 mL/minute.
- Expect to have a platelet count of 70,000/microliter or more without transfusion support for the first 4 weeks of the study anytime that they are not hospitalized.
- Have normal blood coagulation. This is defined by either a prothrombin time and aPTT within the laboratory's normal range (11.8-14.7 sec and 23.4-34.5 sec respectively), or by hemostatic coagulation factor levels in patients with prolonged prothrombin times and/or aPTTs that are explained by mild factor VII deficiencies (30-40 %) or by lupus anticoagulants. If a patient has a prolonged aPTT due to a lupus anticoagulant, he/she must have a normal thrombin time in order to be included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- A preference by the primary investigator to use saline flushes for the patient's VAD.
- A history of hypersensitivity to heparin, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
- (Note that a patient is not excluded simply because he/she has participated in this protocol with a previous VAD or because he/she still has a previously inserted VAD that has been left in place.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Raad II, Luna M, Khalil SA, Costerton JW, Lam C, Bodey GP. The relationship between the thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters. JAMA. 1994 Apr 6;271(13):1014-6.
PMID: 8139059BACKGROUNDXiang DZ, Verbeken EK, Van Lommel AT, Stas M, De Wever I. Composition and formation of the sleeve enveloping a central venous catheter. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Aug;28(2):260-71. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70162-4.
PMID: 9719321BACKGROUNDHolcombe BJ, Forloines-Lynn S, Garmhausen LW. Restoring patency of long-term central venous access devices. J Intraven Nurs. 1992 Jan-Feb;15(1):36-41.
PMID: 1564598BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 7, 2002
First Posted
June 10, 2002
Study Start
May 1, 2002
Study Completion
April 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 4, 2008
Record last verified: 2006-04