NCT00037960

Brief Summary

We propose to develop and evaluate a workstation that significantly enhances the application of Constraint-Induced (CI) Therapy by automating and instrumenting several of the tasks currently used in the shaping training. The motivation for development of such a device is as follows: 1) Patients could receive CI therapy at home without the need for constant supervision from a therapist. Many veterans do not have the resources to travel to their local VAMC for the two or three week period required for the treatment. A home-based device would expand the pool of veterans who could receive CI therapy. 2) For subjects who were able to receive CI therapy in the clinic, this device would facilitate an effective post-treatment home-practice program. 3) Currently, patients are treated on a one-on-one basis in the clinic. This device could allow one therapist to treat 3 or 4 patients at one time, thereby substantially reducing the cost of the therapy. 4) This workstation would provide clear and comprehensive quantification of the progress of the treatment. This could indicate on which tasks the patient was progressing most and least rapidly, and would therefore enable effective modifications of the treatment plan while treatment was in progress. The hypothesis is that the positive outcomes of CI therapy can be achieved, and possibly enhanced, if the shaping training component is performed in a workstation that guides, motivates and records exercise of the more-affected limb. In the first 18 months, the workstation will be designed and fabricated. To expedite the design, we will rely on simple modifications to "off the shelf" components. In the last 18 months, a controlled, randomized, clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of automated CI therapy programs with standard CI therapy. The standard CI therapy group would receive shaping training in a clinical setting, one-on-one with a therapist. The clinic-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training in the workstation, in a clinical setting and with minimal supervision. The home-based automated CI therapy group would perform the shaping training at home in the workstation, and with no direct supervision. All other aspects of the three treatment programs will be identical. At the end of this 3-year project, a device will have been designed, built and evaluated that could significantly enhance the application of CI therapy for chronic stroke patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2001

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2001

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2002

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 27, 2002

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2004

Completed
Last Updated

January 21, 2009

Status Verified

May 1, 2002

First QC Date

May 24, 2002

Last Update Submit

January 20, 2009

Conditions

Keywords

Constrained InducedCI therapyCVAStrokes

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Stroke patients

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Medical Center

Palo Alto, California, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Constraint Induced Movement Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyPhysical Therapy ModalitiesTherapeuticsRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • David Wolff, Ph.D. Special Assistant to the Director

    Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research & Development Service

  • Danielle Kerkovitch, Ph.D.

    Program Analysis and Review Section (PARS), VA Rehabilitation Research and Development Service

  • Edward Taub, Ph.D.

    University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
FED

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2002

First Posted

May 27, 2002

Study Start

June 1, 2001

Study Completion

June 1, 2004

Last Updated

January 21, 2009

Record last verified: 2002-05

Locations