Gemcitabine With or Without Capecitabine in Treating Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Gemcitabine Plus Capecitabine Versus Gemcitabine Alone In Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. A Randomized Phase III Trial
4 other identifiers
interventional
319
4 countries
18
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known if gemcitabine is more effective with or without capecitabine in treating pancreatic cancer. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of gemcitabine with or without capecitabine in treating patients who have advanced pancreatic cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 pancreatic-cancer
Started Jun 2001
Longer than P75 for phase_3 pancreatic-cancer
18 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 14, 2002
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 27, 2003
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2004
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2008
CompletedMay 15, 2019
May 1, 2019
3 years
February 14, 2002
May 14, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Gemcitabine + Capecitabine vs. Gemcitabine alone
To compare survival, efficacy, quality of life and toxicity between the combination therapy (Capecitabine and Gemcitabine) and the monotherapy (Gemcitabine alone) in advanced pancreatic cancer.
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Gemcitabine + Capecitabine
ACTIVE COMPARATORGemcitabine + Capecitabine
Gemcitabine alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORGemcitabine alone
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (18)
Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
Vienna, A-1090, Austria
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239, Israel
Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
Milan, 20133, Italy
Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
Naples, 80131, Italy
Kantonspital Aarau
Aarau, 5001, Switzerland
Saint Claraspital AG
Basel, CH-4016, Switzerland
Universitatsspital-Basel
Basel, CH-4031, Switzerland
Inselspital, Bern
Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland
Spitalzentrum Biel
Biel, CH-2501, Switzerland
Ratisches Kantons und Regionalspital
Chur, CH-7000, Switzerland
Hopital Cantonal Universitaire de Geneve
Geneva, CH-1211, Switzerland
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
Lausanne, CH-1011, Switzerland
Kantonsspital - St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, CH-9007, Switzerland
Institut Central des Hopitaux Valaisans
Sion, CH1951, Switzerland
Regionalspital
Thun, 3600, Switzerland
City Hospital Triemli
Zurich, 8063, Switzerland
Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland
Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
UniversitaetsSpital
Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Glimelius B, Hess V, Bodoky G, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R. Estimating prognosis and palliation based on tumour marker CA 19-9 and quality of life indicators in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Br J Cancer. 2010 Oct 26;103(9):1318-24. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605929. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
PMID: 20877359RESULTBernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W, Gerber D, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Glimelius B, Bajetta E, Schuller J, Saletti P, Bauer J, Figer A, Pestalozzi BC, Kohne CH, Mingrone W, Stemmer SM, Tamas K, Kornek GV, Koeberle D, Herrmann R; Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial--SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3695-701. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.6240.
PMID: 18669454RESULTHess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P, Dietrich D, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Bajetta E, Saletti P, Figer A, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R. CA 19-9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Feb;9(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70001-9.
PMID: 18249033RESULTHerrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Glimelius B, Bajetta E, Schuller J, Saletti P, Bauer J, Figer A, Pestalozzi B, Kohne CH, Mingrone W, Stemmer SM, Tamas K, Kornek GV, Koeberle D, Cina S, Bernhard J, Dietrich D, Scheithauer W; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research; Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. Gemcitabine plus capecitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer: a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Central European Cooperative Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 1;25(16):2212-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0886.
PMID: 17538165RESULTGargiulo P, Dietrich D, Herrmann R, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Scheithauer W, Glimelius B, Berardi S, Pignata S, Brauchli P. Predicting mortality and adverse events in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in a multicentre phase III randomized clinical trial: the APC-SAKK risk scores. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019 Jan 2;11:1758835918818351. doi: 10.1177/1758835918818351. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30636977RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Richard Herrmann, MD
Universitaetsspital-Basel
- STUDY CHAIR
Werner Scheithauer, MD
Allgemeines Krankenhaus - Universitatskliniken
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 14, 2002
First Posted
January 27, 2003
Study Start
June 1, 2001
Primary Completion
June 1, 2004
Study Completion
April 1, 2008
Last Updated
May 15, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05