Automated Calls With Nurse Follow-Up to Improve Diabetes Ambulatory Care
1 other identifier
interventional
272
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Regular outpatient follow-up is important for all diabetes patients, with some needing frequent attention because their health is unstable, their treatment regimen is complex, or their social supports are inadequate. However, many patients live with access barriers that limit their use of outpatient services, fail to attend outpatient appointments, and experience worse outcomes than trials of aggressive management suggest is possible. Although labor-intensive, telephone care programs are one potential strategy for bringing diabetes management services into patients� homes and improving their glycemic control. Automated telephone disease management (ATDM) systems can augment telephone care by providing frequent monitoring and health education to large patient panels while focusing clinicians� attention on individuals who need it most. Although this technology has shown some promise, it has not been rigorously evaluated, particularly in VA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 diabetes
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2001
CompletedApril 7, 2015
February 1, 2007
March 14, 2001
April 6, 2015
Conditions
Study Arms (1)
Arm 1
OTHERInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- VA patients with diabetes taking hypoglycemic medications. Patients with serious mental disorders, no touch tone telephone, or a life expectancy of \< 1 year were excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Palo Alto, Michigan, 94304-1290, United States
Related Publications (7)
Piette JD, McPhee SJ, Weinberger M, Mah CA, Kraemer FB. Use of automated telephone disease management calls in an ethnically diverse sample of low-income patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Aug;22(8):1302-9. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.8.1302.
PMID: 10480775RESULTPiette JD. Patient education via automated calls: a study of English and Spanish speakers with diabetes. Am J Prev Med. 1999 Aug;17(2):138-41. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00061-6.
PMID: 10490057RESULTPiette JD. Satisfaction with automated telephone disease management calls and its relationship to their use. Diabetes Educ. 2000 Nov-Dec;26(6):1003-10. doi: 10.1177/014572170002600613.
PMID: 11912804RESULTPiette JD. Perceived access problems among patients with diabetes in two public systems of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Nov;15(11):797-804. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91107.x.
PMID: 11119172RESULTPiette JD, Weinberger M, Kraemer FB, McPhee SJ. Impact of automated calls with nurse follow-up on diabetes treatment outcomes in a Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb;24(2):202-8. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.202.
PMID: 11213866RESULTPiette JD. Interactive voice response systems in the diagnosis and management of chronic disease. Am J Manag Care. 2000 Jul;6(7):817-27.
PMID: 11067378RESULTPiette JD. Satisfaction with care among patients with diabetes in two public health care systems. Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6):538-46. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906000-00003.
PMID: 10386566RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John D. Piette, PhD
VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- FED
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2001
First Posted
March 16, 2001
Study Completion
December 1, 1999
Last Updated
April 7, 2015
Record last verified: 2007-02