Hand Exercise and Upper Arm Anesthesia to Improvements Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Patients
Improvements of Hand Function in Chronic Stroke Related to Upper Arm Anesthesia
2 other identifiers
observational
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of an experimental treatment to improve hand function in patients who have had a stroke affecting one side of the body. One of the main problems of stroke patients is difficulty using the affected hand. Most treatments focus on acute (early) intervention, although special exercises may help some chronic patients. Previous studies have indicated that combining hand exercises with anesthesia (blocking motor and sensory function) of the upper arm may improve hand movement in stroke patients, even in the chronic state. This study will examine whether the exercise plus anesthesia treatment is more beneficial for these patients over the long-term than exercise alone. Patients 18 years or older who are at least 12 months post stroke, which has affected only one side of the body, may be eligible for this study. Candidates will have a medical history and physical and neurological examinations. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups: one will practice hand exercises without upper arm anesthesia and the other will exercise with anesthesia. All patients will perform two consecutive sessions of 30-minute pinch practice-forceful pinching of the thumb and index finger. Patients in the anesthesia group will have the anesthetic injected in the lower neck. Enough anesthetic will be administered to block motor and sensory function in the shoulder and upper arm, while maintaining as much function as possible in the forearm and hand. All patients will also have transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) testing. For this procedure, a very brief electrical current is passed through an insulated wire coil placed on the head, producing a magnetic pulse. The pulse travels through the scalp and skull and causes small electrical currents in the outer part of the brain. During the study, the patient will be asked to make movements, do simple tasks, or tense muscles, while the electrical activity of the muscles is recorded. Patients will have four sessions at 3-week intervals and three follow-up sessions at 3 weeks, 9 weeks and 24 weeks after the testing. Follow-up evaluations will include pinch power testing, TMS, sensory function test and hand function measurement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2000
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2000
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 17, 2000
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 18, 2000
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2006
CompletedMarch 4, 2008
March 1, 2006
October 17, 2000
March 3, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Twelve hemispheric patients (right or left) with residual arm function who had a single monohemispheric stroke (documented by CT or MRI) at least 12 months before, without severe proprioceptive deficits, independent of previous physical therapy will be included.
- They should all be able to perform the training task.
You may not qualify if:
- Excluded from the study will be: patients with more than one stroke;
- patients with large cortical, cerebellar or brainstem lesions;
- Patients unable to extend metacarpophalangeal (MP) joints at least 10-20 degrees;
- Patients unable to extend the wrist at least 20 degrees;
- Patients with substantially recovered motor function;
- Patients with severe depression, poor motivational capacity, or severe language disturbances, particularly of receptive nature;
- Patients with severe spasticity/pain;
- Patients with bilateral motor problems;
- Patients with serious cognitive deficits (defined as equivalent to a mini-mental state exam score of 20 or less);
- Patients severe uncontrolled medical problems (e.g. cardiovascular disease, severe rheumatoid arthritis, active joint deformity of arthritic origin, active cancer or renal disease, any kind of end-stage pulmonary or cardiovascular disease, or a deteriorated condition due to age, uncontrolled epilepsy or others);
- Patients with respiratory failure;
- Patients with friable plaques (class D disease) or a stenosis exceeding 70% in the internal carotid artery ipsilateral to the side of paresis (as assessed with ultrasonography).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Schlaug G, Knorr U, Seitz R. Inter-subject variability of cerebral activations in acquiring a motor skill: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp Brain Res. 1994;98(3):523-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00233989.
PMID: 8056072BACKGROUNDNudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996 Jan 15;16(2):785-807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-02-00785.1996.
PMID: 8551360BACKGROUNDMatchar DB, McCrory DC, Barnett HJ, Feussner JR. Medical treatment for stroke prevention. Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jul 1;121(1):41-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00008.
PMID: 7880225BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2000
First Posted
October 18, 2000
Study Start
October 1, 2000
Study Completion
March 1, 2006
Last Updated
March 4, 2008
Record last verified: 2006-03