Study Stopped
Terminated due to poor accrual.
Pilocarpine in Treating Patients With Dry Mouth Caused by Opioids
A Double Blind Phase III Study of Oral Pilocarpine for Opioid-Induced Dry Mouth
4 other identifiers
interventional
4
1 country
2
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Pilocarpine may help to relieve dry mouth in patients receiving opioids for cancer therapy. It is not yet known whether pilocarpine is more effective than no further treatment for this condition. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to determine the effectiveness of pilocarpine in treating patients who have dry mouth caused by opioids.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started May 1998
Longer than P75 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 22, 1998
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 17, 2004
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2007
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2008
CompletedApril 3, 2020
April 1, 2020
9.5 years
November 1, 1999
April 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy
To evaluate, using a 100 mm VAS, the effectiveness of oral pilocarpine 5 mg qid in relieving dry mouth due to the ongoing use of an opioid for cancer related pain at 2 weeks (day 15). This will include comparing the proportion of at least one response during the 2 week period, time to first response and duration of first response.
10 years
Study Arms (2)
Pilocarpine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPlacebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
BC Cancer Agency
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E6, Canada
Humber River Regional Hospital
Weston, Ontario, M9N 1N8, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Engelhardt M, Dold SM, Ihorst G, Zober A, Moller M, Reinhardt H, Hieke S, Schumacher M, Wasch R. Geriatric assessment in multiple myeloma patients: validation of the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) score and comparison with other common comorbidity scores. Haematologica. 2016 Sep;101(9):1110-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.148189. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
PMID: 27479825DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
David Warr, MD
Princess Margaret Hospital, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 1, 1999
First Posted
August 17, 2004
Study Start
May 22, 1998
Primary Completion
November 1, 2007
Study Completion
December 15, 2008
Last Updated
April 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share