Comparison of Echocardiographic Techniques in Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
Comparison of Myocardial Contrast Echo With Dobutamine Echo in Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease
2 other identifiers
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare two different echocardiographic techniques in the evaluation of heart disease (coronary artery disease). Both tests called Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography with Pharmacologic Stress and Stress Echocardiography with Dobutamine, are performed using a standard echocardiographic machine. Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography (MCE) does not use radioactivity. It uses sound waves like standard echocardiography. However, with MCE patients receive an injection of a "contrast agent" directly into the blood stream through a vein. The contrast agent, called Optison, is made of tiny microbubbles smaller than red blood cells. The echocardiogram can detect these microbubbles in the small blood vessels of the heart muscle and allow researchers to find areas of the heart receiving less blood flow than others. It is important to observe the heart during exercise because there are changes in blood flow. Since MCE cannot be performed when the patient is exercising, researchers give medication (adenosine) that stimulates the heart and creates a situation similar to exercise. Stress Echocardiography with Dobutamine does not use radioactivity. It uses sound waves like standard echocardiography. During this echocardiogram patients receive doses of a medication called dobutamine that stimulates the heart to beat stronger and faster. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of MCE compared to stress echocardiography at detecting coronary artery disease (CAD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 1999
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 1999
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 1999
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2001
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 10, 2002
CompletedMarch 4, 2008
February 1, 2000
November 3, 1999
March 3, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (3)
Lumley P, Broadley KJ, Levy GP. Analysis of the inotropic: chronotropic selectivity of dobutamine and dopamine in anaethetised dogs and guinea-pig isolated atria. Cardiovasc Res. 1977 Jan;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1093/cvr/11.1.17.
PMID: 12867BACKGROUNDArmstrong WF. Stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991 Sep;84(3 Suppl):I43-9.
PMID: 1884503BACKGROUNDPellikka PA. Stress echocardiography in the evaluation of chest pain and accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997 May-Jun;39(6):523-32. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(97)80011-4.
PMID: 9166363BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 1999
First Posted
December 10, 2002
Study Start
March 1, 1999
Study Completion
March 1, 2001
Last Updated
March 4, 2008
Record last verified: 2000-02