NCT00001889

Brief Summary

This study is designed to compare two different echocardiographic techniques in the evaluation of heart disease (coronary artery disease). Both tests called Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography with Pharmacologic Stress and Stress Echocardiography with Dobutamine, are performed using a standard echocardiographic machine. Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography (MCE) does not use radioactivity. It uses sound waves like standard echocardiography. However, with MCE patients receive an injection of a "contrast agent" directly into the blood stream through a vein. The contrast agent, called Optison, is made of tiny microbubbles smaller than red blood cells. The echocardiogram can detect these microbubbles in the small blood vessels of the heart muscle and allow researchers to find areas of the heart receiving less blood flow than others. It is important to observe the heart during exercise because there are changes in blood flow. Since MCE cannot be performed when the patient is exercising, researchers give medication (adenosine) that stimulates the heart and creates a situation similar to exercise. Stress Echocardiography with Dobutamine does not use radioactivity. It uses sound waves like standard echocardiography. During this echocardiogram patients receive doses of a medication called dobutamine that stimulates the heart to beat stronger and faster. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of MCE compared to stress echocardiography at detecting coronary artery disease (CAD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 1999

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 1999

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 1999

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2001

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 10, 2002

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2008

Status Verified

February 1, 2000

First QC Date

November 3, 1999

Last Update Submit

March 3, 2008

Conditions

Keywords

MicrobubblesMyocardial Blood FlowMyocardial IschemiaSecond HarmonicsUltrasoundCoronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Adults 18 years of age or older. No pre-menopausal patients who are lactating, pregnant or potentially pregnant as judged by history, physical examination, ultrasound or urine pregnancy test. No unstable angina patients. No recent myocardial infarction patients (less than 1 month). No frequent ectopy which precludes adequate image acquisition. No history of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. No patients receiving aminophylline, theophylline or dipyridamole. No presence of second and third degree heart block without pacemaker. No significant hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than 170 mm Hg) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg). No hypotension: basal sitting systolic arterial pressure less than 100 mm Hg confirmed 30 minutes later. No sinus tachycardia greater than or equal to 100 beats per min. No atrial fibrillation. No inadequate two-dimensional echocardiographic windows.

Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Lumley P, Broadley KJ, Levy GP. Analysis of the inotropic: chronotropic selectivity of dobutamine and dopamine in anaethetised dogs and guinea-pig isolated atria. Cardiovasc Res. 1977 Jan;11(1):17-25. doi: 10.1093/cvr/11.1.17.

    PMID: 12867BACKGROUND
  • Armstrong WF. Stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991 Sep;84(3 Suppl):I43-9.

    PMID: 1884503BACKGROUND
  • Pellikka PA. Stress echocardiography in the evaluation of chest pain and accuracy in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997 May-Jun;39(6):523-32. doi: 10.1016/s0033-0620(97)80011-4.

    PMID: 9166363BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaCoronary Artery Disease

Interventions

Dobutamine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CatecholaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsPhenethylaminesEthylaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Purpose
TREATMENT
Sponsor Type
NIH

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 1999

First Posted

December 10, 2002

Study Start

March 1, 1999

Study Completion

March 1, 2001

Last Updated

March 4, 2008

Record last verified: 2000-02

Locations