Survey of the Use of Alternative Medical Therapies in Adult Cancer Patients Enrolled in Phase I Clinical Trials
2 other identifiers
observational
125
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Simultaneous use of alternative or complementary medical therapies by cancer patients undergoing conventional medical treatment is extremely common and may not always be disclosed to the patient's treating physician. Cancer patients undergoing Phase I therapy on clinical trials constitute a special population of patients, since by definition, their prescribed therapy is scientifically unproven in terms of efficacy. Phase I patients are closely monitored for adverse effects in order to identify and characterize the toxicities and to define a tolerable dose of their experimental treatment. Thus, the unrecognized use of alternative therapies by patients actively enrolled in phase I trials may potentially confound rational drug development by causing adverse side effects or by contributing to drug interactions. Examples of clinical toxicities induced by alternative medical treatments include liver dysfunction or renal failure caused by herbal preparations, or hematologic abnormalities, such as eosinophilia-myalgia syndrome caused by tryptophan food supplements. Therefore, it is important to document and determine the prevalence of alternative therapy use in this specific patient population; however, this issue has not previously been examined in a scientifically rigorous manner. We propose to conduct a survey and interview study of phase I cancer patients enrolled in ongoing clinical trials at the National Cancer Institute to determine the prevalence of alternative therapy use in this population. This study will also examine patient attitudes and perceptions regarding their use of alternative therapy as compared with their scientifically-sanctioned phase I experimental therapy. This information has important implications for drug development.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 1998
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 1998
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 1999
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2002
CompletedMarch 4, 2008
January 1, 2002
November 3, 1999
March 3, 2008
Conditions
Keywords
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Related Publications (2)
Eisenberg DM, Kessler RC, Foster C, Norlock FE, Calkins DR, Delbanco TL. Unconventional medicine in the United States. Prevalence, costs, and patterns of use. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 28;328(4):246-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199301283280406.
PMID: 8418405BACKGROUNDCassileth BR, Chapman CC. Alternative and complementary cancer therapies. Cancer. 1996 Mar 15;77(6):1026-34. No abstract available.
PMID: 8635119BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 1999
First Posted
November 4, 1999
Study Start
April 1, 1998
Study Completion
January 1, 2002
Last Updated
March 4, 2008
Record last verified: 2002-01