Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) - Intervertebral Disc Herniation
SPORT
2 other identifiers
interventional
501
1 country
13
Brief Summary
This study tests the effectiveness of different treatments for the three most commonly diagnosed lumbar (lower) spine conditions. The purpose of the study is to learn which of two commonly prescribed treatments (surgery and non-surgical therapy) works better for specific types of low back pain. In this part of the study, people with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (damage to the tissue between the bones of the lower spine, or backbone) will receive either discectomy (surgical removal of herniated disc material) or non-surgical treatment. This study does not cover the cost of treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Mar 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_4
13 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 3, 1999
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 1999
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedAugust 4, 2015
August 1, 2015
15.1 years
November 3, 1999
August 3, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in health-related quality of life as measured by the SF-36 health status questionnaire
Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Patient satisfaction with treatment
Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, Annually thereafter
utility for current health in order to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYS) as the measure for cost effectiveness
Baseline, 1 yr, 4 yr
resource utilization
Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter
cost
Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter
Study Arms (2)
Surgery
ACTIVE COMPARATORDiskectomy
Non-surgical intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORNon-surgical treatments
Interventions
The surgeon will leave the nerve root freely mobile and undamaged following the procedure. During the procedure, the surgeon may consider using loop magnification or a microscope. The surgical incision will be midline and, after reflecting the paraspinous muscles, the interlaminar level will be identified and entered. The nerve root will be clearly identified and mobilized and then gently retracted to prepare for the discectomy. Removal of the medial border of the superior facet may, in some cases, be necessary in order to have a clear view of the lateral border of the involved nerve root. Following the clear view of the nerve root and mobilization, the IDH will be approached by making a small annular incision if necessary, the fragment of disc will then be removed (i.e., limited disc excision). A search of the canal will follow removal of the fragment, along with probing of the intervertebral-foramen for residual disc or bony pathology.
Active physical therapy modality, Education/Counseling with home exercise instruction, and an NSAID if tolerated
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks.
- Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy.
- Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising.
- Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).
You may not qualify if:
- Previous lumbar spine surgery.
- Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months.
- Possible pregnancy.
- Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years.
- Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine.
- Age less than 18 years.
- Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery).
- Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys.
- Symptoms less than 6 weeks.
- Patient currently enrolled in any experimental "spine related" study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (13)
Kaiser Permanente Spine Care Program
Oakland, California, 94612, United States
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143-0728, United States
The Emory Clinic, Emory University
Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States
Rush-Presbyterian, St. Luke's Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3833, United States
Maine Spine & Rehabilitation
Scarborough, Maine, 04074, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-9952, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Nebraska Foundation for Spinal Research
Omaha, Nebraska, 68154-4438, United States
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center - Spine Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States
New York University, The Hospital for Joint Diseases
New York, New York, 10003, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-4216, United States
Related Publications (13)
Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Lurie JD, Deyo R, Wennberg JE. Design of the Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1361-72. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206150-00020.
PMID: 12065987BACKGROUNDWeinstein JN, Brown PW, Hanscom B, Walsh T, Nelson EC. Designing an ambulatory clinical practice for outcomes improvement: from vision to reality--the Spine Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock, year one. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000 Winter;8(2):1-20. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200008020-00003.
PMID: 10787504BACKGROUNDFanciullo GJ, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN, Chawarski MC, Jamison RN, Baird JC. Cluster analysis classification of SF-36 profiles for patients with spinal pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2276-82. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084880.33281.EB.
PMID: 14520044BACKGROUNDPhillips FM, An H, Kang JD, Boden SD, Weinstein J. Biologic treatment for intervertebral disc degeneration: summary statement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S99. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076906.82028.03.
PMID: 12897482BACKGROUNDWalsh TL, Hanscom B, Lurie JD, Weinstein JN. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):607-15. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000050654.97387.DF.
PMID: 12642770BACKGROUNDWeinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451.
PMID: 17119141RESULTWeinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2441-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441.
PMID: 17119140RESULTWeinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2789-800. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4.
PMID: 19018250RESULTTosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, Grove MR, Hanscom B, Blood EA, Weinstein JN. The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318182e390.
PMID: 18777603RESULTTosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Abdu W, Herkowitz H, Andersson G, Albert T, Bridwell K, Zhao W, Grove MR, Weinstein MC, Weinstein JN. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2061-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318235457b.
PMID: 22048651RESULTDesai A, Bekelis K, Ball PA, Lurie J, Mirza SK, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Weinstein JN. Spine patient outcomes research trial: do outcomes vary across centers for surgery for lumbar disc herniation? Neurosurgery. 2012 Oct;71(4):833-42. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826772cb.
PMID: 22791040DERIVEDDesai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K, Lurie J, Mirza SK, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Weinstein JN. Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does incidental durotomy affect outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):406-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182349bc5.
PMID: 21971123DERIVEDOlson PR, Lurie JD, Frymoyer J, Walsh T, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, Weinstein JN. Lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does educational attainment impact outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):2324-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820bfb9a.
PMID: 21311402DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James N. Weinstein, DO, MS
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 3, 1999
First Posted
November 4, 1999
Study Start
March 1, 2000
Primary Completion
April 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
August 4, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-08