NCT00000410

Brief Summary

This study tests the effectiveness of different treatments for the three most commonly diagnosed lumbar (lower) spine conditions. The purpose of the study is to learn which of two commonly prescribed treatments (surgery and non-surgical therapy) works better for specific types of low back pain. In this part of the study, people with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (damage to the tissue between the bones of the lower spine, or backbone) will receive either discectomy (surgical removal of herniated disc material) or non-surgical treatment. This study does not cover the cost of treatment.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
501

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2000

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

13 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 3, 1999

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 4, 1999

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2000

Completed
15.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

August 4, 2015

Status Verified

August 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

15.1 years

First QC Date

November 3, 1999

Last Update Submit

August 3, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Intervertebral disc herniation (IDH)Stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS)Spinal stenosis (SpS)Low back pain (LBP)Leg painSurgical therapyNon-surgical therapyRandomized studyMulticenterMRI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in health-related quality of life as measured by the SF-36 health status questionnaire

    Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Patient satisfaction with treatment

    Baseline, 6 wks, 3 mos, Annually thereafter

  • utility for current health in order to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYS) as the measure for cost effectiveness

    Baseline, 1 yr, 4 yr

  • resource utilization

    Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter

  • cost

    Baseline, 6 wks, 3 and 6 mos, Annually thereafter

Study Arms (2)

Surgery

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Diskectomy

Procedure: DiskectomyProcedure: Non-surgical treatments

Non-surgical intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Non-surgical treatments

Procedure: Non-surgical treatments

Interventions

DiskectomyPROCEDURE

The surgeon will leave the nerve root freely mobile and undamaged following the procedure. During the procedure, the surgeon may consider using loop magnification or a microscope. The surgical incision will be midline and, after reflecting the paraspinous muscles, the interlaminar level will be identified and entered. The nerve root will be clearly identified and mobilized and then gently retracted to prepare for the discectomy. Removal of the medial border of the superior facet may, in some cases, be necessary in order to have a clear view of the lateral border of the involved nerve root. Following the clear view of the nerve root and mobilization, the IDH will be approached by making a small annular incision if necessary, the fragment of disc will then be removed (i.e., limited disc excision). A search of the canal will follow removal of the fragment, along with probing of the intervertebral-foramen for residual disc or bony pathology.

Surgery

Active physical therapy modality, Education/Counseling with home exercise instruction, and an NSAID if tolerated

Non-surgical interventionSurgery

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Duration of symptoms: 6 or more weeks.
  • Treatments tried: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medical therapy and physical therapy.
  • Surgical screening: Persistent radicular pain provoked by moderate exercise, sitting, increased abdominal pressure, decreased mobility, list (scoliosis), straight leg raising.
  • Tests: MRI to confirm diagnosis and level(s).

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous lumbar spine surgery.
  • Not a surgical candidate for any of these reasons: Overall health which makes spinal surgery too life-threatening to be an appropriate alternative, dramatic improvement with conservative care, or inability (for any reason) to undergo surgery within 6 months.
  • Possible pregnancy.
  • Active malignancy: A patient with a history of any invasive malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer) is ineligible unless he or she has been treated with a curative intent AND there has been no clinical signs or symptoms of the malignancy for at least 5 years.
  • Current fracture, infection, and/or deformity (greater than 15 degrees of lumbar scoliosis, using Cobb measure technique) of the spine.
  • Age less than 18 years.
  • Cauda Equina syndrome or progressive neurological deficit (usually requiring urgent surgery).
  • Unavailability for follow-up (planning to move, no telephone, etc.) or inability to complete data surveys.
  • Symptoms less than 6 weeks.
  • Patient currently enrolled in any experimental "spine related" study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (13)

Kaiser Permanente Spine Care Program

Oakland, California, 94612, United States

Location

University of California, San Francisco

San Francisco, California, 94143-0728, United States

Location

The Emory Clinic, Emory University

Decatur, Georgia, 30033, United States

Location

Rush-Presbyterian, St. Luke's Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3833, United States

Location

Maine Spine & Rehabilitation

Scarborough, Maine, 04074, United States

Location

William Beaumont Hospital

Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-9952, United States

Location

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Nebraska Foundation for Spinal Research

Omaha, Nebraska, 68154-4438, United States

Location

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center - Spine Center

Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756, United States

Location

New York University, The Hospital for Joint Diseases

New York, New York, 10003, United States

Location

Hospital for Special Surgery

New York, New York, 10021, United States

Location

Case Western Reserve University

Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States

Location

Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107-4216, United States

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Birkmeyer NJ, Weinstein JN, Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Lurie JD, Deyo R, Wennberg JE. Design of the Spine Patient outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1361-72. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206150-00020.

    PMID: 12065987BACKGROUND
  • Weinstein JN, Brown PW, Hanscom B, Walsh T, Nelson EC. Designing an ambulatory clinical practice for outcomes improvement: from vision to reality--the Spine Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock, year one. Qual Manag Health Care. 2000 Winter;8(2):1-20. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200008020-00003.

    PMID: 10787504BACKGROUND
  • Fanciullo GJ, Hanscom B, Weinstein JN, Chawarski MC, Jamison RN, Baird JC. Cluster analysis classification of SF-36 profiles for patients with spinal pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2276-82. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084880.33281.EB.

    PMID: 14520044BACKGROUND
  • Phillips FM, An H, Kang JD, Boden SD, Weinstein J. Biologic treatment for intervertebral disc degeneration: summary statement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S99. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076906.82028.03.

    PMID: 12897482BACKGROUND
  • Walsh TL, Hanscom B, Lurie JD, Weinstein JN. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):607-15. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000050654.97387.DF.

    PMID: 12642770BACKGROUND
  • Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Hanscom B, Tosteson AN, Herkowitz H, Fischgrund J, Cammisa FP, Albert T, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) observational cohort. JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2451-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2451.

  • Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Hanscom B, Skinner JS, Abdu WA, Hilibrand AS, Boden SD, Deyo RA. Surgical vs nonoperative treatment for lumbar disk herniation: the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2441-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.20.2441.

  • Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Tosteson AN, Blood EA, Abdu WA, Herkowitz H, Hilibrand A, Albert T, Fischgrund J. Surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: four-year results for the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2789-800. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ed8f4.

  • Tosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, Grove MR, Hanscom B, Blood EA, Weinstein JN. The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318182e390.

  • Tosteson AN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Abdu W, Herkowitz H, Andersson G, Albert T, Bridwell K, Zhao W, Grove MR, Weinstein MC, Weinstein JN. Comparative effectiveness evidence from the spine patient outcomes research trial: surgical versus nonoperative care for spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and intervertebral disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2061-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318235457b.

  • Desai A, Bekelis K, Ball PA, Lurie J, Mirza SK, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Weinstein JN. Spine patient outcomes research trial: do outcomes vary across centers for surgery for lumbar disc herniation? Neurosurgery. 2012 Oct;71(4):833-42. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826772cb.

  • Desai A, Ball PA, Bekelis K, Lurie J, Mirza SK, Tosteson TD, Zhao W, Weinstein JN. Surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does incidental durotomy affect outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Mar 1;37(5):406-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182349bc5.

  • Olson PR, Lurie JD, Frymoyer J, Walsh T, Zhao W, Morgan TS, Abdu WA, Weinstein JN. Lumbar disc herniation in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial: does educational attainment impact outcome? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):2324-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820bfb9a.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementLow Back PainSpinal Stenosis

Interventions

Diskectomy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBack PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Orthopedic ProceduresTherapeuticsDecompression, SurgicalSurgical Procedures, Operative

Study Officials

  • James N. Weinstein, DO, MS

    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 1999

First Posted

November 4, 1999

Study Start

March 1, 2000

Primary Completion

April 1, 2015

Study Completion

April 1, 2015

Last Updated

August 4, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-08

Locations