Success Metrics

Active Trials
1(50%)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
1
50%
Ph phase_1
1
50%

Phase Distribution

1

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution2 total trials
Phase 1Safety & dosage
1(50.0%)
N/ANon-phased studies
1(50.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Phase 1

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

0.0%

0 of 0 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

1

trials recruiting

Total Trials

2

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

Active, not recruiting1
unknown1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
2
Active
1
Success Rate
N/A
Most Advanced
Phase 1

Trials by Phase

Phase 11 (50.0%)
N/A1 (50.0%)

Trials by Status

active_not_recruiting150%
unknown150%

Recent Activity

1 active trials
Showing 2 of 2
active_not_recruitingnot_applicable

Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) and Microdiscectomy (MD) in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

NCT06615518
unknownphase_1

Microendoscopic Discectomy Vs Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Vs Open Discectomy

NCT02358291

Clinical Trials (2)

Showing 2 of 2 trials
NCT06615518Not Applicable

Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (FELD) and Microdiscectomy (MD) in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniation

Active Not Recruiting
NCT02358291Phase 1

Microendoscopic Discectomy Vs Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Vs Open Discectomy

Unknown

All 2 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
2