Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(2)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

Completed2
unknown1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed267%
unknown133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
completednot_applicable

Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones ≤20 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT07371494
completednot_applicable

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

NCT02519634
unknownnot_applicable

The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo

NCT02760134

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07371494Not Applicable

Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for Renal Stones ≤20 mm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Completed
NCT02519634Not Applicable

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Completed
NCT02760134Not Applicable

The Influence of SMP on Renal Pelvic Pressure In Vivo

Unknown

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3