Success Metrics

Active Trials
0(0%)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

0.0%

0 of 0 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(3)

Detailed Status

Not yet recruiting3

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
N/A
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

not_yet_recruiting3100%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis in Elderly Patients

NCT07639619
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Type 1-2 in Elderly Patients

NCT07636616
not_yet_recruitingnot_applicable

Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures

NCT07624942

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07639619Not Applicable

Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for FFP3-4 Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis in Elderly Patients

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT07636616Not Applicable

Robot Assisted Minimally Invasive Treatment Versus Conservative Treatment for Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis Type 1-2 in Elderly Patients

Not Yet Recruiting
NCT07624942Not Applicable

Robot Assisted Treatment Versus Conventional Surgery for Tile B and C Pelvic Fractures

Not Yet Recruiting

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3