Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(2)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

Completed2
unknown1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed267%
unknown133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
completednot_applicable

Monopolar Versus Biopolar Radiofrequency in OA Knee Pain

NCT05591768
unknownnot_applicable

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With SkinCeuticals A.G.E and Skinceuticals CE FERULIC for Improving Facial Skin Elasticity, Tightening and Fading Fine Lines

NCT06228833
completednot_applicable

Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Pulsed Dye Laser for Treatment of Acne Scars

NCT04461366

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT05591768Not Applicable

Monopolar Versus Biopolar Radiofrequency in OA Knee Pain

Completed
NCT06228833Not Applicable

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Monopolar Radiofrequency Combined With SkinCeuticals A.G.E and Skinceuticals CE FERULIC for Improving Facial Skin Elasticity, Tightening and Fading Fine Lines

Unknown
NCT04461366Not Applicable

Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Pulsed Dye Laser for Treatment of Acne Scars

Completed

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3