Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
2(50%)
Results Posted
50%(1 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
4
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution4 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
4(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

2

trials recruiting

Total Trials

4

all time

Status Distribution
Active(2)
Completed(2)

Detailed Status

Completed2
Recruiting2

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
4
Active
2
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A4 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed250%
recruiting250%

Recent Activity

2 active trials
Showing 4 of 4
recruitingnot_applicable

Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones

NCT07030829
recruitingnot_applicable

Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease

NCT06306222
completednot_applicable

Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow

NCT03023488
completednot_applicable

Electrohydraulic Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Treatment of Difficult to Remove Biliary Stones

NCT01571271

Clinical Trials (4)

Showing 4 of 4 trials
NCT07030829Not Applicable

Laser vs Electrohydraulic Lithotripsy for Difficult CBD Stones

Recruiting
NCT06306222Not Applicable

Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease

Recruiting
NCT03023488Not Applicable

Effects of Flexible Ureteroscopy on Renal Blood Flow

Completed
NCT01571271Not Applicable

Electrohydraulic Versus Laser Lithotripsy for Treatment of Difficult to Remove Biliary Stones

Completed

All 4 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
4