Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Completed(1)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

Enrolling by invitation1
unknown1
Completed1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

enrolling_by_invitation133%
unknown133%
completed133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
enrolling_by_invitationnot_applicable

ESWL vs. Pancreatoscopy-guided Lithotripsy for Painful Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis

NCT04115826
completednot_applicable

Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi

NCT01604304
unknownnot_applicable

External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy(ESWL)

NCT02643134

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT04115826Not Applicable

ESWL vs. Pancreatoscopy-guided Lithotripsy for Painful Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis

Enrolling By Invitation
NCT01604304Not Applicable

Flexible urétéroscopy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy in Renal Calculi

Completed
NCT02643134Not Applicable

External Physical Vibration Lithecbole Versus Traditional Row of Stone After Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy(ESWL)

Unknown

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3