Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 1 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(1/1)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
2
67%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution2 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
2(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

1 of 1 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(1)
Other(2)

Detailed Status

unknown2
Completed1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A2 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed133%
unknown267%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
unknownnot_applicable

A Comparison of Two Regional Techniques for Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy

NCT05839704
unknownnot_applicable

Comparative Study Between Caudal Epidural Block and Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries.

NCT05729308
completed

Comparation of Bilateral and Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT05152602

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT05839704Not Applicable

A Comparison of Two Regional Techniques for Bariatric Sleeve Gastrectomy

Unknown
NCT05729308Not Applicable

Comparative Study Between Caudal Epidural Block and Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbosacral Spine Surgeries.

Unknown
NCT05152602

Comparation of Bilateral and Unilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block

Completed

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
PROCEDURE
Total Trials
3