Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 2 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(2/2)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
100%(2 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
3
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution3 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
3(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

2 of 2 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

3

all time

Status Distribution
Active(1)
Completed(2)

Detailed Status

Completed2
Enrolling by invitation1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
3
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A3 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed267%
enrolling_by_invitation133%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 3 of 3
enrolling_by_invitationnot_applicable

Pyrocarbon Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

NCT07226388
completednot_applicable

Comparison of Glenoid Component Position Using Intelligent Reusable Instrument (IRI) vs Standard Surgical Instruments

NCT01801241
completednot_applicable

Use of Real Time Instrumentation (RTI) in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

NCT01905241

Clinical Trials (3)

Showing 3 of 3 trials
NCT07226388Not Applicable

Pyrocarbon Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Enrolling By Invitation
NCT01801241Not Applicable

Comparison of Glenoid Component Position Using Intelligent Reusable Instrument (IRI) vs Standard Surgical Instruments

Completed
NCT01905241Not Applicable

Use of Real Time Instrumentation (RTI) in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Completed

All 3 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
DEVICE
Total Trials
3