Success Metrics

Clinical Success Rate
100.0%

Based on 3 completed trials

Completion Rate
100%(3/3)
Active Trials
0(0%)
Results Posted
0%(0 trials)

Phase Distribution

Ph not_applicable
4
100%

Phase Distribution

0

Early Stage

0

Mid Stage

0

Late Stage

Phase Distribution4 total trials
N/ANon-phased studies
4(100.0%)

Highest Phase Reached

Unknown

Trial Status & Enrollment

Completion Rate

100.0%

3 of 3 finished

Non-Completion Rate

0.0%

0 ended early

Currently Active

0

trials recruiting

Total Trials

4

all time

Status Distribution
Completed(3)
Other(1)

Detailed Status

Completed3
unknown1

Development Timeline

Analytics

Development Status

Total Trials
4
Active
0
Success Rate
100.0%
Most Advanced
N/A

Trials by Phase

N/A4 (100.0%)

Trials by Status

completed375%
unknown125%

Recent Activity

0 active trials
Showing 4 of 4
completednot_applicable

3D Versus 4K Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT02858986
unknownnot_applicable

2-D and 3-D Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

NCT02610985
completednot_applicable

2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

NCT02320578
completednot_applicable

2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

NCT02320565

Clinical Trials (4)

Showing 4 of 4 trials
NCT02858986Not Applicable

3D Versus 4K Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Completed
NCT02610985Not Applicable

2-D and 3-D Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Unknown
NCT02320578Not Applicable

2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Completed
NCT02320565Not Applicable

2D Versus 3D Radical Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: a Prospective Randomized Trial

Completed

All 4 trials loaded

Drug Details

Intervention Type
DEVICE
Total Trials
4