Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth
9
1
2
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Low Risk
Score: 25/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 9 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
75%
3 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (9)
Clinical Evaluation of a Bulk Fill Resin Composite
Clinical Investigation of the F-Composite 2 System in Direct Filling Therapy
The Performance of Posterior Partial Coverage Coronal Restorations Luted With Two Differrent Systems.
Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study
Clinical Evaluation of "Cention Forte" Restorative Material
Minimal Invasive Rehabilitation of Tooth Loss in the Posterior Segment (MIZE-S)
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Resin Composite Restorations With PBE
Minimal Invasive Rehabilitation of Tooth Loss in the Anterior Segment
Longitudinal Results of a 10-Year Clinical Trial of Repair of Amalgam Restorations