Soft Tissue Augmentation at Dental Implants
8
5
7
1
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 8 trials
100.0%
+13.4% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 1 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.6%
Based on 1 completed trials
Clinical Trials (8)
Evaluation of Multilayered PRF in Comparison With Connective Tissue Graft by Sohn Poncho's Technique on Peri-implant Mucosal Enhancement in the Esthetic Zone
Volumetric Analysis of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Changes Between Polyethereketone(PEEK) Anatomic Healing Abutments and Standard Healing Abutments in Posterior Single Implant Restorations
Assessment of Soft Tissue Thickness Over Zygomatic Implants in Atrophied Maxilla Covered With Buccal Fat Pad vs. Palatal Pedicle Flap
Influence of Acellular Dermal Matrix on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Phenotype and Marginal Bone Loss
Assessment of Soft Tissue Thickness Following Utilization of Buccal Pad of Fat Versus Platelet-rich Fibrin for Covering Zygomatic Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Autogenous Soft Tissue Grafts for Primary Closure Over Immediately Placed Dental Implants
Adjunctive Keratinized Mucosa Augmentation in Peri-Implantitis
Cross-linked Volume-stable Collagen Matrix Versus Connective Tissue Graft At Implant Site.