Presbyopia Correction
11
3
5
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 11 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
25%
1 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (11)
Presbyopic Wear Experience With Multifocal Lenses Compared to Single Vision Lenses and Reading Glasses
Evaluation Of Patient Satisfaction And Quality Of Vision After EDOF Or Trifocal IOL Implantation
A Planned Study at Multiple Sites is Being Done to Compare the Results of Two Types of Trifocal Toric Intraocular Lenses Used in Cataract Surgery
Visual Quality and Performance of Eyes With Asqelio™ EDoF Toric Lenses
Head-to-Head Comparison of Five Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs and One Monofocal IOL
The Purpose is to Evaluate Visual Acuity for Distance, Intermediate and Near and Additionally Contrast Sensitivity at 25% and 10% of Illumination After Implantation of Trifocal IOL, Extended Range of Vision IOL, Bifocal IOL With Low Addition and Monofocal IOL
Photopic and Mesopic Multifocal IOL Performance
Effect of Presbyopia Correction on Livelihood and Repayment Among Solar Customers in Western Region, Kenya
VIS Opti-K Vision Improvement for Presbyopes
Quality of Life in Presbyopes Using Single-vision Lens and Progressive Lens Correction
CLARITI (TM) 1-Day Multifocal Contact Lenses Performance and Acceptance Evaluation