Condition
Peptic Ulcer Perforation
Total Trials
7
Recruiting
0
Active
0
Completed
6
Success Rate
100.0%+13% vs avg
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 40/100
Termination Rate
0.0%
0 terminated out of 7 trials
Success Rate
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
Late-Stage Pipeline
14%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
Results Transparency
0%
0 of 6 completed with results
Key Signals
100% success
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
4Total
Not Applicable (3)
P 4 (1)
Trial Status
Completed6
Unknown1
Trial Success Rate
100.0%
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 6 completed trials
Clinical Trials (7)
Showing 7 of 7 trials
NCT06042933Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary
Early Oral Feeding Versus Traditional Delayed Oral Feeding Post-perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair
NCT05489497CompletedPrimary
Morbidity After Surgical Treatment of Perforated Ulcer
NCT04194060Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary
ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT
NCT04447170Unknown
Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation
NCT01376414Completed
H. Pylori Testing for Patients With Non-specific Upper Abdominal Pain in the Emergency Department
NCT01620671Phase 4CompletedPrimary
Fast-track Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcers
NCT00624169Not ApplicableCompletedPrimary
Peptic Ulcer Perforation Study
Showing all 7 trials