Needlestick Injuries
13
0
0
11
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 13 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 11 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 11 completed trials
Clinical Trials (13)
AI-Supported Gamified Training for Sharps Injury Prevention in Nurses
Sharp Risks in a Time of Crisis: Needle-Stick Injuries in Eastern Sudan Healthcare
Effects of Vibration, Heel Warming and Shotblocker on Pain Levels During Heel Blood Collection
Effects of Three Different Methods in Reducing Pain During Heel Blood Collection
Risk Perception of Needlestick Injury
The Effect of Precede-Proceed Model Based Simulation Experience in Needlestick and Sharps Injuries Among Nurses
A Trial of Blunt Needles for the Reduction of Needlestick Injuries During Cesarean Section
The Influence of Injection Speed on Pain During Administration of Local Anaesthetic.
The Influence of Lidocaine Volume on Discomfort During Administration of Local Anesthetic
The Importance of Needle Gauge for Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic
The Influence of Lidocaine Temperature on Pain During Subcutaneous Administration
Will Adjusting the pH of Lidocaine Reduce the Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic?
Blunt Needles do Not Reduce Needlestick Injuries to Doctors During Suturing After Child-Birth