Mandibular Prognathism
6
0
0
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 40/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
17%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
33%
1 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Trial of Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Induced Paresthesia Using Ultrasonic vs. Reciprocating Saw Instrumentation
Evaluating the Accuracy of Soft Tissue Prediction in Patients With Mandibular Prognathism After Orthognathic Surgery Using Handheld Scanner Versus Optical Scanner A Prospective Clinical Trial
Orthognathic Surgeries and Pharyngeal Airway Space
The Effect of Deliberate Hypotension on QTc, Tp-e Intervals and Heart Rate Variability
Patient Satisfaction Vertical Ramus Osteotomy Patient Specificosteosynthesis Fixation Versus MMFmandibular Prognanthism
Sensory Retraining Facilitates Sensory Recovery After Mandibular Nerve Injury