Intravascular Lithotripsy
8
2
3
2
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 8 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 2 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 2 completed trials
Clinical Trials (8)
Intravascular Lithotripsy Versus Rotational Atherectomy for Severe Coronary Artery Calcification: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Trial
Prognostic Impact of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction After IVL Versus RA in Patients With Severe Coronary Calcification Undergoing PCI
Orbital Atherectomy vs Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Calcified Coronary Nodules (ORBIT-SHOCK).
Optimal Strategy to Correct Stent underexpAnsion in Resistant Lesions
Clinical Trial on the Treatment of Stent Underexpansion Caused by Calcification Using Intravascular Lithotripsy
IVL vs ELCA for Stent Underexpantsion (IVL-ELCA DRAGON)
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intracoronary Lithotripsy Balloon Catheter and Intracoronary Lithotripsy Apparatus
IVL for Stent Underexpantsion