Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization
8
1
1
5
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 8 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 5 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 5 completed trials
Clinical Trials (8)
IASTM Effects on Pain, Functionality, and Proprioception in Subacromial Impingement
Effectiveness of Instrument-Assısted Soft Tissue Mobılızatıon in Patients With Operated Distal Radius Fracture
Investigation of the Effect of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique and Foam Roller Application in Individuals With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain.
Investigation of The Effect of "Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization" in Individuals With Lumbar Disc Herniation
Investigation of the Effect of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique on Flexibility and Thickness by Compression Elastography Method in Healthy Individuals.
Investigation of the Effect of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique on Fascia and Fat Tissue Thickness in Healthy Individuals.
Investigation of the Effect of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique in Individuals With Asymptomatic Dynamic Knee Valgus
The Efficacy Of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization At Lumbar Region Disc Herniations