Hemorrhoidectomy
18
3
6
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 18 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (18)
Definition and Validation of HeQAS for the Assessment of Technical Quality in Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy
Cryotherapy for Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Pain
Reproducibility of a Minimally Invasive Ferguson-type Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III Hemorrhoids
Reproducibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
Argon Plasma Coagulation in Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy
Minimaly Ivnasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
Hemorrhoidectomy With or Without Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in Management of Patients With Hemorrhoids
Acupuncture for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Pain Control
Minimally Invasive Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Compared to Conventional Open Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy: a Clinical Trial
Implementation of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Grade III Hemorrhoids
The Impact of Methylene Blue on the Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Hemorrhoidectomy
Postoperative Pain in the Surgical Treatment of Hemorrhoids: Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy With a Monopolar Electric Scaler VS Bipolar Energy With Caiman® (Aesculap®)
Bowel Preparation Before Hemorrhoidectomy
IntraopeRativE Use of periNeal Block for Hemorrhoidectomy
Preemptive Analgesia for Hemorrhoidectomy
Hemorrhoidectomy in Patients With Grade III and IV Disease:Harmonic Scalpel Compared With Conventional Technique
Comparison Study: Ligasure Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy in III and IV Degree Hemorrhoids.
Eutectic Mixture for Hemorrhoidectomy Postoperative