Gingival Thickness
6
0
0
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Er,Cr:YSGG Laser for Deepithelialization in Gingival Recession.
Examining The Relationship Between Gingival Thickness and Tooth and Gingival Parameters
Evaluation of Gingival Thickness Measurement at Different Anatomical Landmarks
Gingival Thickness of Impacted Maxillary Canines
Soft Tissue Augmentation Using CAF With Either SCTG and Vitamin C Versus SCTG Alone in Management of RT1 Gingival Recession
The Use Of Specially Designed Probe Versus Cone- Beam Computerized Tomography In The Measurement Of Gingival Thickness: Diagnostic Accuracy Study