Fluid Responsiveness Predictability
4
2
2
1
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 4 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 1 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 1 completed trials
Clinical Trials (4)
Comparison of Acoustic Variability Index (AVI) and Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Evaluation of the Variation of the Sub-pulmonary Velocity-time Integral to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
Hemodynamic Response to the End-expiratory Occlusion Test to Titrate Fluid Challenge in Operating Room.
Pulse Pressure Variation for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction