Fluid Responsiveness Predictability
4
0
0
3
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 4 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 3 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 3 completed trials
Clinical Trials (4)
Evaluation of the Variation of the Sub-pulmonary Velocity-time Integral to Predict Fluid Responsiveness
Comparison of Acoustic Variability Index (AVI) and Pulse Pressure Variation (PPV) for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Hemodynamic Response to the End-expiratory Occlusion Test to Titrate Fluid Challenge in Operating Room.
Pulse Pressure Variation for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Coronary Artery Disease Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction