Device
6
1
1
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 6 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (6)
Positioning Device for Female Urinary Catheterization
Assistive Device Satisfaction
Is Continuous Non-Invasive Monitoring Accurate When Used on the Lower Extremity: Finger Vs Toe?
Comparison of Record in VERITON Camera to the Anger Camera Procedure in Patients Treated by 131-iodine
Analytical Validation of the abioSCOPE Device With the in Vitro Device (IVD) CAPSULE PSP Test: Comparison of PSP Values Measured With Venous Whole Blood and Those Measured With Arterial Whole Blood
Study To Evaluate The Sensitivity Of The Linda Thermal Device