Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
11
2
4
5
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 11 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 5 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 5 completed trials
Clinical Trials (11)
Retrospective Comparison of Tubular Decompression ± Rhizotomy Versus TLIF in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Study With NVDX3 for Treatment of Low Grade Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Standardized Perioperative Care Protocol for Lumbar Fusion Surgery
Comparison of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion(MIS-TLIF) for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Degenerative Spondylolisthesis; Micro-decompression vs Decompression + Instrumented Fusion; Long Term Follow up
Long-term Reoperations After Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Surgery
Long-term Safety Trial with NVDX3
Midline Lumbar Fusion Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
OP-1 Putty for Posterolateral Fusions
A Prospective Pilot Study of the OP-1 Putty in Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusions
Study of OP-1 Putty in Uninstrumented Posterolateral Fusions