Chronotropic Incompetence
9
0
0
5
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
83% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 49/100
11.1%
1 terminated out of 9 trials
83.3%
-3.2% vs benchmark
11%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
60%
3 of 5 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 5 completed trials
Clinical Trials (9)
Effects of a Supervised Training Program on Functional Capacity in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence
Efficacy Study of Pacemakers to Treat Slow Heart Rate in Patients With Heart Failure
Comparing Rate Response With CLS Versus Accelerometer ICD Settings in Heart Failure Patients With BIOTRONIK CRT-Ds
β-blockers Withdrawal in Patients With HFpEF and Chronotropic Incompetence: Effect on Functional Capacity (Preserve-HR)
Pacing in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients
Rate Adaptive Atrial Pacing in Heart Failure
The Effect of Blended Sensor Efficiency on Relieving the Heart's Inability to Increase Its Rate During Exercise
Comparison of Physiologic Response With Rate Adaptive Pacing Driven by Minute Ventilation and Accelerometer
Common Sensing and Right Ventricular Automatic Capture (COGNATE)