Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
58
8
14
23
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
72% trial completion
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
High Risk
Score: 72/100
15.5%
9 terminated out of 58 trials
71.9%
-14.6% vs benchmark
7%
4 trials in Phase 3/4
22%
5 of 23 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 23 completed trials
Clinical Trials (58)
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing TRIPLE Site ventriculAr Stimulation Versus Conventional Pacing in CRT canDidates
THE RELATİONSHİP BETWEEN BLOOD GAS PARAMETERS OBTAİNED FROM THE CORONARY SİNUS DURİNG THE PROCEDURE AND CRT RESPONSE İN PATİENTS WİTH HEART FAİLURE WHO UNDERWENT CRT IMPLANTATİON
Feasibility and Outcomes Registry of Lumenless dEfibrillation Leads for Conduction System Pacing
His-Bundle Corrective Pacing in Heart Failure
Efficacy, Safety and Cost of Remote Monitoring of Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
MRI Assessment of Patient Suitability for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT)
ElectrocardioGraphic Imaging During Left bUndle Branch Implant to valiDate Ecg Criteria
Effects of IMT on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Imaging Study of Allocation of Pacing Targets in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Absolute Coronary Flow in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction and Left Bundle Branch Block With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Ertugliflozin to Reduce Arrhythmic Burden in ICD/CRT patientS (ERASe-Trial) - a Phase III Study
Factors Associated With Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Non-LBBB ECG Pattern
Safety and Performance Aspects of CRT-DX System in Patients With Sinus Rhythm
WiCS-LV Post Market Surveillance Registry
Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalization or Cardiac Transplant
CSP Versus BiVP for Heart Failure Patients with RVP Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Safety and Performance Evaluation of a New Catheter Range for Lead Implantation At Interventricular Septum
Comparison of Upper Extremity Function, Physical Activity Levels and Peripheral Muscle Strength, Fear of Movement, Balance, Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life in Patients With Pacemakers According to Pacemaker Type
Verifying Remote Monitoring Effect on Net Cardiovascular Outcome; RemoteVerify (RêVe)
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Delivery Guided Non-Invasive Electrical and Venous Anatomy Assessment