Abdominal Fat
11
0
1
7
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
88% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 37/100
9.1%
1 terminated out of 11 trials
87.5%
+1.0% vs benchmark
9%
1 trials in Phase 3/4
43%
3 of 7 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 7 completed trials
Clinical Trials (11)
A Pilot Study Testing a Noninvasive Cryolipolysis Device Versus a High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Fat Reduction
Study To Assess Radiofrequency Diathermocontraction Device For Muscle Stimulation And The Treatment Of Abdominal Fat
Comparison of the Effects of Electric Current With Needles and Surface Electrodes on the Abdominal Contour of Women
Effects of GLP-1RA on Body Weight, Metabolism and Fat Distribution in Overweight/Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Comparing the Efficacy of a Dual-Frequency LLLT Device With a Sham Device as a Therapy for Adipose Tissue Loss
Long-term Follow-up Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
Pivotal Study of the truSculpt Radiofrequency Device for Circumferential Reduction
Analysis of CoolSculpting by Zeltiq for Non-Invasive Cooling of Abdominal Fat Using the eZ App Large Applicator
VelaShape III Device in Comparison to Cryolipolysis for Circumferential Reduction
Ultrashape System in Combination With VelaShape II Device for Circumferential Reduction
Effects of Whole Grain on Weight Maintenance