Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Medical Monitor and Medical Augmented Reality Glasses in Endoscopy: Observation Study
1 other identifier
observational
25
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of medical augmented reality glasses and general monitors when distinguishing mucosal lesions from submucosal lesions in endoscopic diagnosis for early gastric cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Sep 2019
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2020
CompletedSeptember 10, 2019
September 1, 2019
3 months
August 26, 2019
September 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Consistency between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass
All series of images will be reviewed by several endoscopists by evaluation of several endoscopic findings. Then, concordance rate between the result from medical monitor and that from medical augmented reality glass will be assessed. More specifically, % of patients that does not show the same results (m cancer, sm cancer, or indeterminate) between medical monitor and medical augmented reality will be assessed.
Image review will be conducted after full collection of both series of images. Review process will be done within 3 months after acquision of images. The time for study completion is aimed at 1 year from the start date.
Interventions
Endoscopic images from medical monitor and medical augmented reality glasses will be collected and reviewed. Outcomes from both series of images will be compared
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection will be the study population
You may qualify if:
- Patients with early gastric cancer who are scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection
- Age 19 or more
- Patients who voluntarily participated in this clinical study and signed a written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with poor general medical condition which does not allow them to understand and submit a informed consent
- Patients who do not agree with this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Yoon JW, Chen RE, Kim EJ, Akinduro OO, Kerezoudis P, Han PK, Si P, Freeman WD, Diaz RJ, Komotar RJ, Pirris SM, Brown BL, Bydon M, Wang MY, Wharen RE Jr, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1914. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1914. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
PMID: 29708640BACKGROUNDTakeshita H, Kihara K, Yoshida S, Higuchi S, Ito M, Nakanishi Y, Kijima T, Ishioka J, Matsuoka Y, Numao N, Saito K, Fujii Y. Clinical application of a modern high-definition head-mounted display in sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Aug;33(8):1499-504. doi: 10.7863/ultra.33.8.1499.
PMID: 25063416BACKGROUNDEckardt C, Paulo EB. HEADS-UP SURGERY FOR VITREORETINAL PROCEDURES: An Experimental and Clinical Study. Retina. 2016 Jan;36(1):137-47. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000689.
PMID: 26200516BACKGROUNDChoi J, Kim SG, Im JP, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Endoscopic prediction of tumor invasion depth in early gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):917-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.053. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
PMID: 21316050BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2019
First Posted
September 10, 2019
Study Start
September 1, 2019
Primary Completion
December 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2020
Last Updated
September 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share